Cited by 3

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Development discourse

Ziai, Aram·2015·Development Discourse and Global History

Abstract

Two different discourses, development and globalisation, can be identified as successively dominating global North-South relations in the past decades. A concise analysis of both discourses is relevant and insightful because notions of development and of globalisation are conceptualising social change in strikingly different ways and with different attitudes towards social engineering. Globalisation discourse in line with neoclassical economic theory and regards interventions in the market mechanism as the source of inefficient resource allocation resulting in higher prices and lower quality in goods and services. In the neoliberal perspective, whose theoretical basis was to be found in neoclassical and monetarist economics, the perceived failures of development policy were attributed to flawed Keynesian strategies: the idea of the necessity and beneficial effects of state intervention was blamed for over-inflated public sectors, inefficient state enterprises, and an overemphasis on the means of production.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315753782-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 3

Metadata

Authors
Ziai, A.
Venue
Development Discourse and Global History
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2015-08-27
Pages
70-85
Cited by
3
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review