Cited by 108Feminist Epistemology and Gender StudiesHermeneutics and Narrative IdentityEpistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Epistemic Injustice, Ignorance, and Trans Experiences

Fricker, Miranda, Jenkins, Katharine·2017·The Routledge Companion to Feminist Philosophy

Abstract

Hermeneutical injustice is the injustice of being frustrated in an attempt to render a significant social experience intelligible where hermeneutical marginalization is a significant causal factor in that failure. Someone counts as hermeneutically marginalized insofar as they belong to a social group that under-contributes to the common pool of concepts and social meanings. Trans people report experiences that are surely ones of testimonial injustice. Pre-emptive testimonial injustice is effectively an advance credibility deficit sufficient to ensure that one&s;s word is not even solicited. The testimonial injustices of various kinds suffered by trans people offer a particularly stark illustration of the connection between testimonial injustice and hermeneutical marginalization. Hermeneutical marginalization is the key condition for hermeneutical injustice, which will occur with any failed or frustrated attempt at intelligibility that is significantly due to the marginalization. Remedying hermeneutical injustice often begins by developing an operative concept that is used by a particular community to fill the hermeneutical lacuna.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315758152-23

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Anderson, Elizabeth (2012) “Epistemic Justice as a Virtue of Social Institutions,” Social Epistemology 26(2): 163–173. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fricker, M., & Jenkins, K.
Venue
The Routledge Companion to Feminist Philosophy
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2017-09-19
Pages
268-278
OpenAlex
W2736990559
Cited by
108
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
7.84
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Keywords
epistemic injustice, hermeneutical injustice, testimonial injustice, transgender people, credibility deficit, epistemic ignorance, intelligibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review