Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 484

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Detailed Balance Limit of Efficiency of p–n Junction Solar Cells

Shockley, William, Queisser, Hans·2018·Renewable Energy

Abstract

Many papers have been written about the efficiency of solar cells employing p-n junctions in semiconductors, the great potential of the silicon solar cell having been emphasized by Chapin, Fuller and Pearson 1 in 1954. Also in 1954, Pfann and van Roosbroeck 2 gave a more detailed treatment including analytic expressions optimizing or matching the load. A further treatment was given by Prince 3 in 1955, in which the efficiency was calculated as a function of the energy gap. Loferski 4 has attempted to predict the dependence of efficiency upon energy gap in more detail. Review papers have recently appeared in two journals in this country. 5,6

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315793245-44

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 484

Metadata

Authors
Shockley, W., & Queisser, H.
Venue
Renewable Energy
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2018-12-14
Pages
35-54
ISSN
0960-1481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4236360742
Cited by
484
References
0
FWCI
113.92
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detailed Balance Limit of Efficiency of p–n Junction Solar Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315793245-44
The paper
Shockley, W., & Queisser, H. (2018). Detailed Balance Limit of Efficiency of p–n Junction Solar Cells. Renewable Energy. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315793245-44

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.