Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 255

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Time Matters in Groups

·2014·Intellectual Teamwork

Abstract

This chapter suggests the obstacles to formalizing the diagnostic process through increased reliance on computer-based information systems is that physicians typically assess the adequacy of medical information on the basis of the perceived credibility of the source, whether the source is the patient or another physician. Medical decision making in university hospitals is an example of socially distributed cognition that is carried out through the medium of task-relevant discourse. Hutchins argues that the social and temporal organization of cognitive activity outweigh the frequent preoccupation with individual intelligence or cognition in accounting for performance in a variety of domains. A unique type of interaction between the infectious disease attending (IDA) and pathology attending (PA) existed in the two hospitals. The work setting examined briefly in this chapter includes several problem solving tasks and an institutionalized division of labor that formally specifies the kinds of knowledge background or expertise associated with persons occupying particular positions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315807645-9

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 255

Metadata

Venue
Intellectual Teamwork
Published
2014-01-14
Pages
37-76
OpenAlex
W1757444011
Cited by
255
References
1
FWCI
43.61
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Time Matters in Groups. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315807645-9
The paper
Time Matters in Groups. (2014). Intellectual Teamwork. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315807645-9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.