The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Stimulated Recall Methodology in Applied Linguistics and L2 Research
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This method is frequently applied to examine instructors' and students' reflections on their cognitive and affective responses during or after specific educational events or activities (Calderhead, 1981;Gass and Mackey, 2016).”
From A systematic review of Stimulated Recall (SR) in educational research from 2012 to 2022 (2024) · cites this paper as Gass and Mackey, 2016
In the citing paper
“While linguistics and teacher education are the primary application areas of SR, it is also used in other subjects, such as STEM education (Gass and Mackey, 2016;Al Mamun, Lawrie, and Wright, 2020;Schindler and Lilienthal, 2019).”
From A systematic review of Stimulated Recall (SR) in educational research from 2012 to 2022 (2024) · cites this paper as Gass and Mackey, 2016
In the citing paper
“When practicing interview strategies, researchers have exhibited distinctive tendencies in time arrangement and questioning techniques (Gass and Mackey, 2016).”
From A systematic review of Stimulated Recall (SR) in educational research from 2012 to 2022 (2024) · cites this paper as Gass and Mackey, 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A systematic review of Stimulated Recall (SR) in educational research from 2012 to 2022
Zhai, X., Chu, X., Wang, M., Tsai, C.-C., Liang, J.-C., & Spector, J. M. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-02987-6 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A.
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2016-09-19
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stimulated Recall Methodology in Applied Linguistics and L2 Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315813349
- The paper
- Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2016). Stimulated Recall Methodology in Applied Linguistics and L2 Research. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315813349
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.