The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Helping Doctoral Students Write
Abstract
Helping Doctoral Students Write offers a proven approach to effective doctoral writing. By treating research as writing and writing as research, the authors offer pedagogical strategies for doctoral supervisors that will assist the production of well-argued and lively dissertations. It is clear that many doctoral candidates find research writing complicated and difficult, but the advice they receive often glosses over the complexities of writing and/or locates the problem in the writer. Kamler and Thomson provide a highly effective framework for scholarly work that is located in personal, institutional and cultural contexts. The pedagogical approach developed in the book is based on the notion of writing as a social practice. This approach allows supervisors to think of doctoral writers as novices who need to learn new ways with words as they enter the discursive practices of scholarly communities. This involves learning sophisticated writing practices with specific sets of conventions and textual characteristics. The authors offer supervisors practical advice on helping with commonly encountered writing tasks such as the proposal, the journal abstract, the literature review and constructing the dissertation argument. The first edition of this book has helped many academics and thousands of research students produce better written material. Now fully updated the second edition includes: Examples from a broader range of academic disciplines A new chapter on writing from the th…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Kamler and Thomson (2014) similarly describe doctoral writing as part of 'writing the scholar' into being.”
From From production to verification: generative AI, doctoral formation, and the leadership of digital education (2026) · cites this paper as Kamler and Thomson, 2014
In the citing paper
“if doctoral writing is part of 'writing the scholar' into being, as Kamler and Thomson (2014) argue”
From From production to verification: generative AI, doctoral formation, and the leadership of digital education (2026) · cites this paper as Kamler and Thomson (2014)
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Feeling like a researcher: experiences of early doctoral students in Australia
Mantai, L. (2015) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1067603 · Cited by 172
Developing Academic Identity: A Review of the Literature on Doctoral Writing and Feedback
Inouye, K., & McAlpine, L. (2019) · International journal of doctoral studies · doi:10.28945/4168 · Cited by 130
Emery, A. A., & Anderman, L. H. (2020) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2020.1787170 · Cited by 89
Redefining scholarship for health professions education: AMEE Guide No. 142
Cleland, J., Jamieson, S., Kusurkar, R. A., Ramani, S., WILKINSON, T. J., & Schalkwyk, S. C. V. (2021) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2021.1900555 · Cited by 62
Doctoral publishing and academic identity work: two cases
Xu, L., & Grant, B. M. (2020) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2020.1728522 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Kamler, B., & Thomson, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- ORCID
- Thomson, Pat
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2014-03-21
- OpenAlex
- W4234467415
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 11.48
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Writing and Publishing
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
- Keywords
- doctoral writing, thesis writing, doctoral supervision, writing as social practice, academic identity, writing as research, academic community, academic writing style, literature review writing, research proposal writing, abstract writing, note-taking, academic conferences, social media in academia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review