Describing speech acts: linking research and pedagogy
Abstract
This chapter focuses on factors that contribute to whether strategy use is successful, and introduces a proposed taxonomy of learner strategies for acquiring pragmatics, with an emphasis on speech acts. The chapter ends with two activities. The first activity gives us a firsthand opportunity to experience using strategies to collect information about an L2 speech act. The second activity provides an opportunity to observe the strategies that we use in performing a speech act and to learn from others about the strategies that they use for the same speech act. The act of planning and making a request involves a sequence or cluster of different strategies. The chapter looks at a suggested taxonomy of strategies intended specifically for the learning and performance of L2 speech acts. The strategies in this taxonomy are drawn from a larger and more detailed taxonomy appearing in the literature.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An explanation immediately follows the second sorry in (45)-I don't good English-one of the major strategies that make up the apology speech act.
“In addition, it is noted that an explanation immediately follows it-I don't good English-one of the major strategies that make up the apology speech act (Ishihara & Cohen, 2014).”
From 'Sorry, I don't good English': Japanese L2 students' written peer feedback in the face-to-face and anonymous review modes (2023) · cites this paper as Ishihara & Cohen, 2014
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kim, S. (2023) · Journal of Writing Research · doi:10.17239/jowr-2023.15.02.02 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ishihara, N., & Cohen, A. D.
- Venue
- Teaching and Learning Pragmatics
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2014-07-16
- Pages
- 68-86
- OpenAlex
- W3017967778
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 1.10
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Keywords
- speech acts, student learning strategies, second language pragmatics, strategy taxonomy, request strategies, strategy instruction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review