Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,146

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar

Open access
·2014·Universal Grammar (RLE Linguistics A: General Linguistics)

Abstract

Current treatments of Passive in the literature on generative grammar may be roughly grouped into three types: sentential, lexical, and phrasal. Sentential treatments consider &s;passives&s; to be sentences derived from another sentence. Strictly lexical views are more recent in the generative literature. The idea behind the minimal domain principle (MDP) is that in defining a particular derivational function, whether of a lexical, phrase structural, transformational, or morphophonemic sort, we take the domain of definition of the function to be the smallest class level of structures on which it can be defined giving adequate results. The conception of Passive is assumed embedded in a conception of Core Grammar in which rules are stated generally using variables ranging over grammatical categories, and rules for particular languages are drawn from those in Core Grammar by specifying values for the variables in accordance with stipulated Parameter Conditions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315880259-11

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 2,146

Metadata

Venue
Universal Grammar (RLE Linguistics A: General Linguistics)
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2014-02-03
Pages
17-59
OpenAlex
W196354989
Cited by
2,146
References
0
FWCI
472.11
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315880259-11
The paper
Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar. (2014). Universal Grammar (RLE Linguistics A: General Linguistics). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315880259-11

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.