The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
The Making and Breaking of Soviet Lithuania
Abstract
Appearing on the world stage in 1918, Lithuania suffered numerous invasions, border changes and large scale population displacements.The successive occupations of Stalin in 1940 and Hitler in 1941, mass deportations to the Gulag and the elimination of the Jewish community in the Holocaust gave the horrors of World War II a special ferocity. Moreover, the fighting continued after 1945 with the anti-Soviet insurrection, crushed through mass deportations and forced collectivization in 1948-1951. At no point, however, did the process of national consolidation take a pause, making Lithuania an improbably representative case study of successful nation-building in this troubled region. As postwar reconstruction gained pace, ethnic Lithuanians from the countryside – the only community to remain after the war in significant numbers – were mobilized to work in the cities. They streamed into factory and university alike, creating a modern urban society, with new elites who had a surprising degree of freedom to promote national culture. This book describes how the national cultural elites constructed a Soviet Lithuanian identity against a backdrop of forced modernization in the fifties and sixties, and how they subsequently took it apart by evoking the memory of traumatic displacement in the seventies and eighties, later emerging as prominent leaders of the popular movement against Soviet rule.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While this focus has its origins in the wartime propaganda of the Soviet state (Makhotina 2016, 153), it also resonated with the rapidly spreading turn towards the ethnic village as a source of authentic identity, common across the Soviet Union and especially strongly felt in Soviet Lithuania in the late 1960s and 70s (Davoliūtė 2013, 125–153).”
From Cold War cinema and the traumatic turn in Europe:Fact(1980) as a Soviet mirror of the Holocaust film (2020) · cites this paper as Davoliūtė 2013
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cold War cinema and the traumatic turn in Europe:Fact(1980) as a Soviet mirror of the Holocaust film
Davoliūtė, V. (2020) · Studies in Russian and Soviet Cinema · doi:10.1080/17503132.2020.1711612
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Davoliūtė, V.
- Corresponding author
- Davoliūtė, Violeta
- ORCID
- Davoliūtė, Violeta
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2014-01-03
- OpenAlex
- W4231980608
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 3.46
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Soviet and Russian History
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Eastern European Communism and Reforms
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Central European national history
- Keywords
- Soviet Lithuania, nation-building, Lithuanian national identity, Soviet occupation of Lithuania, Holocaust, forced collectivization, postwar reconstruction, urbanization, memory, anti-Soviet movement, Soviet nationalities policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review