The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Deterrence, Choice, and Crime, Volume 23 : Contemporary Perspectives
Abstract
Part I. Theories of Deterrence 1. Classical Theory: The Emergence of Deterrence Theory in the Age of Enlightenment Gerben J. N. Bruinsma 2. The Economics of Deterrence: A Review of the Theory and Evidence Aaron J. Chalfin and Sarah Tahamont 3. Perceptual Deterrence Theory Raymond Paternoster 4. Criminological Theory and Deterrence Christopher J. Sullivan and Melissa Lugo Part II. Unpacking the Effects of Deterrence 5. Informal and Formal Sanctions Robert J. Apel and Samuel E. DeWitt 6. Deterrent Effects of the Certainty and Severity of Punishment Daniel S. Nagin 7. Celerity and Deterrence Travis C. Pratt and Jillian J. Turanovic 8. Individual Difference and Deterrence Thomas A. Loughran, Raymond Paternoster, and Alex R. Piquero Part III. Agents of Deterrence 9. Police Interventions Nicholas Corsaro and David Weisburd 10. Place Management, Guardianship, and the Establishment of Order John E. Eck and Tamara D. Madensen 11. Corrections and Deterrence Cheryl Lero Jonson and Sarah L. Manchak 12. Community Members and Deterrence Pamela Wilcox and Francis T. Cullen Part IV. Final Thoughts 13. An Honest Politician's Guide to Deterrence: Certainty, Severity, Celerity, and Parsimony Michael Tonry 14. Remembering Ray Paternoster: Contributions to Deterrence, Criminology, and His Students Alex R. Piquero
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although deterrence and labeling have rich theoretical histories and long empirical records (see Farrington & Murray, 2014; Nagin, Cullen, & Jonson, 2018), few studies have been designed to adjudicate between the two frameworks in a broadly generalizable way.”
From Does contact with the justice system deter or promote future delinquency? Results from a longitudinal study of British adolescent twins (2020) · cites this paper as Nagin, Cullen, & Jonson, 2018
Citations
Cited by
Motz, R. T., Barnes, J. C., Caspi, A., Arseneault, L., Cullen, F. T., Houts, R., Wertz, J., & Moffitt, T. E. (2020) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12236 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2018-04-17
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deterrence, Choice, and Crime, Volume 23 : Contemporary Perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781351112710
- The paper
- Deterrence, Choice, and Crime, Volume 23 : Contemporary Perspectives. (2018). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351112710
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
