The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Where are all the women? public memory, gender and memorialisation in contemporary Belfast
Abstract
This chapter focuses on public memory-making practices that have emerged during the post-conflict context from both bottom-up and top-down initiatives, and some of their consequences in terms of gender. It presents S. McDowell in dissecting the role of murals, memorials and active commemorations in Northern Ireland, and how they link to silencing women's experiences and narratives of the conflict in favour of implicitly androcentric perspectives. The chapter focuses on two case studies – from loyalist East and South Belfast – in order to examine the role and place of the memory of women in the post-Agreement context. It also focuses on the role of gender in exploring official and unofficial attempts at place-making in loyalist areas of Belfast. A close examination of community memorialisation practices in contemporary Belfast reveals complex and entangled narratives of place, identity and conflict continue to exist twenty years post-Agreement.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This absent presence has allowed the McGurk’s campaigners to effectively disrupt official attempts at peace-process placemaking, which have focused on relandscaping and dropping public art into main thoroughfares (McAtackney 2018), by re-presencing it into place.”
From Material Dissonances in the Post-Conflict City: Re-Presencing Social Injustice in Belfast, Northern Ireland (2024) · cites this paper as McAtackney 2018
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
McAtackney, L. (2024) · Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/s41636-024-00497-5 · Cited by 3
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- McAtackney, L.
- Venue
- Heritage after Conflict
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2018-07-18
- Pages
- 154-172
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Where are all the women? public memory, gender and memorialisation in contemporary Belfast. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781351164320-10
- The paper
- McAtackney, L. (2018). Where are all the women? public memory, gender and memorialisation in contemporary Belfast. Heritage after Conflict. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351164320-10