The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Thinking critically about and researching algorithms
Abstract
More and more aspects of our everyday lives are being mediated, augmented, produced and regulated by software-enabled technologies. Software is fundamentally composed of algorithms: sets of defined steps structured to process instructions/data to produce an output. This paper synthesises and extends emerging critical thinking about algorithms and considers how best to research them in practice. Four main arguments are developed. First, there is a pressing need to focus critical and empirical attention on algorithms and the work that they do given their increasing importance in shaping social and economic life. Second, algorithms can be conceived in a number of ways – technically, computationally, mathematically, politically, culturally, economically, contextually, materially, philosophically, ethically – but are best understood as being contingent, ontogenetic and performative in nature, and embedded in wider socio-technical assemblages. Third, there are three main challenges that hinder research about algorithms (gaining access to their formulation; they are heterogeneous and embedded in wider systems; their work unfolds contextually and contingently), which require practical and epistemological attention. Fourth, the constitution and work of algorithms can be empirically studied in a number of ways, each of which has strengths and weaknesses that need to be systematically evaluated. Six methodological approaches designed to produce insights into the nature and work of algor…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This practice, increasingly prevalent among young adults, raises fundamental questions about how AI systems shape not merely what we do, but who we understand ourselves to be [1].”
From Encountering Generative AI: Narrative Self-Formation and Technologies of the Self Among Young Adults (2026) · cites this paper as [1]
Citations
Cites
Al-Akkad, A., Ramirez, L., Denef, S., Boden, A., Ashmore, L. A., Büscher, M., & Zimmermann, A. (2013) · Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (OzCHI) · doi:10.1145/2541016.2541051 · Cited by 17
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate
Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951716679679 · Cited by 4,567
The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines
Hagendorff, T. (2020) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 394
Bonini, T., & Treré, E. (2024) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/14329.001.0001 · Cited by 247
AI for Everyone? Critical Perspectives
Verdegem, P., Kaplan, A., Hofkirchner, W., Ng, J., McQuillan, D., Rehak, R., Daly, A., Devit, S. K., Mann, M., Steinhoff, J., et al. (2021) · University of Westminster Press eBooks · doi:10.16997/book55 · Cited by 68
Hagendorff, T. (2021) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-021-09573-8 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Kitchin, R.
- Corresponding author
- Kitchin, Rob
- ORCID
- Kitchin, Rob
- Venue
- The Social Power of Algorithms
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2019-10-23
- Pages
- 14-29
- OpenAlex
- W4232646084
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9
- FWCI
- 55.71
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
- Keywords
- algorithms, critical algorithm studies, computer software, sociotechnical assemblages, algorithmic mediation, algorithmic ethics, algorithmic culture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review