The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The algorithmic imaginary: exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms
Abstract
This article reflects the kinds of situations and spaces where people and algorithms meet. In what situations do people become aware of algorithms? How do they experience and make sense of these algorithms, given their often hidden and invisible nature? To what extent does an awareness of algorithms affect people's use of these platforms, if at all? To help answer these questions, this article examines people's personal stories about the Facebook algorithm through tweets and interviews with 25 ordinary users. To understand the spaces where people and algorithms meet, this article develops the notion of the algorithmic imaginary. It is argued that the algorithmic imaginary – ways of thinking about what algorithms are, what they should be and how they function – is not just productive of different moods and sensations but plays a generative role in moulding the Facebook algorithm itself. Examining how algorithms make people feel, then, seems crucial if we want to understand their social power.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Facebook provides a breeding ground for the dissemination of AI-generated images due to algorithms that favor content eliciting an emotional response.
“Facebook, as one of the largest social media websites of Meta Platform Inc., provides a breeding ground for the dissemination of such images, due to algorithms that favor content that elicits an emotional response (Bucher, 2019).”
From The illusion of reality: How AI-generated images (AIGIs) are fooling social media users (2026) · cites this paper as Bucher, 2019
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Agger, B. (2012). Oversharing: Presentations of self in the internet age. New York, NY: Routledge.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The illusion of reality: How AI-generated images (AIGIs) are fooling social media users
Miskolczi, M. (2026) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2025.108876 · Cited by 5
CRUISING TIKTOK: USING ALGORITHMIC FOLK KNOWLEDGE TO EVADE CISHETERONORMATIVE CONTENT MODERATION
Monea, A. (2023) · AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research · doi:10.5210/spir.v2023i0.13466 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Bucher, T.
- Corresponding author
- Bucher, Taina
- ORCID
- Bucher, Taina
- Venue
- The Social Power of Algorithms
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2019-10-23
- Pages
- 30-44
- OpenAlex
- W4239679885
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 5.37
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- algorithmic imaginaries, Facebook algorithm, algorithm awareness, ordinary users, affect, social networking sites
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review