The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Prison Oppresses: Avoiding the False Us/Them Binary in Prison Education
Abstract
This chapter is perhaps primarily useful for someone who is very early in their experience of teaching in jail or prison. The people who work in jails and prisons are a diverse group who have come to their work for a variety of reasons and have been affected by their time working in jails and prisons in a variety of ways. The prison industrial complex is a vast system of oppression that not only maintains, but creates, segregation and hierarchy among the people it contains. A study conducted by Thomas Carnahan and Sam McFarland out of Western Kentucky University in 2007, however, suggests that selection bias may have been at work here in ways that not examined before. Education in jails and prisons does not come easily, and engaging our students in educational programming is often a struggle, which is a form of resistance. However, Coogan goes on to argue, ignorance of the other benefits no one.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Faculty in prison education programs must be willing to examine and re-examine their role in this oppressive system.
“To accomplish this, faculty in prison education programs must be willing to examine, and re-examine, their role in this oppressive system (Bryan, 2019, p. 160).”
From Striving to Thrive: Black and Indigenous Women Reflect on Higher Education in Oregon’s Only Women’s Prison (2022) · cites this paper as Bryan, 2019
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Carnahan, T. and McFarland, S. (2007). Revisiting the Stanford prison experiment: Could participant self-selection have led to the cruelty? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(5), 603–614. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Arthur, D., Davis, T., Johnson, K., Loweb, R., Rowe, L., & Womack, S. (2022) · JCSCORE · doi:10.15763/issn.2642-2387.2022.8.1.20-35
Metadata
- Authors
- Bryan, V. M.
- Corresponding author
- Bryan, Victoria M.
- ORCID
- Bryan, Victoria M.
- Venue
- Critical Perspectives on Teaching in Prison
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2019-05-14
- Pages
- 157-165
- OpenAlex
- W2946471239
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 1.84
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Education › Adult and Continuing Education Topics
- Keywords
- prison education, prison industrial complex, oppression, segregation, hierarchy, prison staff, resistance, selection bias, educational programming
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
