The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does a feather in your hat a barbarian make?
Abstract
Fenghuangshan M1, a tomb located in the Ordos Desert, is one of several Han dynasty (206 BCE–220 CE) tombs excavated in Inner Mongolia whose murals remain well-preserved. Across its four walls male and female figures appear in a number of scenes common in Han mortuary art, but they wear hairstyles and headgear that scholars have associated with the Xiongnu and the Qiang, two non-Han groups mentioned in textual sources. This chapter takes a different approach and, instead, highlights the diversity of headgear and hairstyles in this tomb, some of which can be securely placed in the larger corpus of Han male and female headgear and hairstyles, and others that cannot. Rather than argue for a one-to-one correlation with groups mentioned in historical sources, this chapter argues the depiction of headgear and hairstyles in these murals are better understood as expressions of the contested and complicated nature of political, cultural, and social identity along the Han northern frontier.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The man does not wear the standard Han tunic that is drawn across the chest and is secured by a belt, and the feather in his hat/hairstyle is also uncommon in other first-and second-century CE tombs (Wallace 2019).”
From Dual Portraits of the Deceased in Yangqiaopan M1, Jingbian, Shaanxi (2019) · cites this paper as Wallace 2019
Citations
Cites
Politics of Mourning in Early China, The
Brown, M. (2007) · doi:10.1353/book5216 · Cited by 71
Cited by
Dual Portraits of the Deceased in Yangqiaopan M1, Jingbian, Shaanxi
Wallace, L. (2019) · Asian Studies · doi:10.4312/as.2019.7.2.203-219 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wallace, L. V.
- Venue
- The Art and Archaeology of Bodily Adornment
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2019-07-03
- Pages
- 161-175
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does a feather in your hat a barbarian make? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781351268325-9
- The paper
- Wallace, L. V. (2019). Does a feather in your hat a barbarian make? The Art and Archaeology of Bodily Adornment. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351268325-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.