Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does a feather in your hat a barbarian make?

Wallace, Leslie V.·2019·The Art and Archaeology of Bodily Adornment

Abstract

Fenghuangshan M1, a tomb located in the Ordos Desert, is one of several Han dynasty (206 BCE–220 CE) tombs excavated in Inner Mongolia whose murals remain well-preserved. Across its four walls male and female figures appear in a number of scenes common in Han mortuary art, but they wear hairstyles and headgear that scholars have associated with the Xiongnu and the Qiang, two non-Han groups mentioned in textual sources. This chapter takes a different approach and, instead, highlights the diversity of headgear and hairstyles in this tomb, some of which can be securely placed in the larger corpus of Han male and female headgear and hairstyles, and others that cannot. Rather than argue for a one-to-one correlation with groups mentioned in historical sources, this chapter argues the depiction of headgear and hairstyles in these murals are better understood as expressions of the contested and complicated nature of political, cultural, and social identity along the Han northern frontier.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781351268325-9

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wallace, L. V.
Venue
The Art and Archaeology of Bodily Adornment
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2019-07-03
Pages
161-175
Cited by
1
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does a feather in your hat a barbarian make? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781351268325-9
The paper
Wallace, L. V. (2019). Does a feather in your hat a barbarian make? The Art and Archaeology of Bodily Adornment. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351268325-9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.