Response To Student Writing: Implications for Second Language Students
Abstract
This volume synthesizes and critically analyzes the literature on response to the writing of second language students, and discusses the implications of the research for teaching practice in the areas of written and oral teacher commentary on student writing, error correction, and facilitation of peer response. The book features numerous examples of student texts and teacher commentary, as well as figures and appendices that summarize research findings and present sample lessons and other teaching materials. It is thus simultaneously comprehensive in its approach to the existing research and highly practical in showing current and future teachers how this material applies to their everyday endeavors of responding to student writing and teaching composition classes. Response to student writing--whether it takes the form of teachers' written feedback on content, error correction, teacher-student conferences, or peer response--is an extremely important component of teaching second language writing. Probably no single activity takes more teacher time and energy. Response to Student Writing is a valuable theoretical and practical resource for those involved in this crucial work, including L2 composition researchers, in-service and preservice teachers of ESOL/EFL writers, and teacher educators preparing graduate students for the teaching of writing.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Facilitating productive use of feedback in higher education
Jonsson, A. (2013) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787412467125 · Cited by 414 · see citing works
Hu, G., & Lam, S. T. E. (2010) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9086-1 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
The Effectiveness of feedback for L1-English and L2-writing development: a meta-analysis.
Biber, D., Nekrasova, T., & Horn, B. (2011) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2011.tb02241.x · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Error Correction in the L2 Writing Classroom: What Do Students Think?
Lee, I. (2005) · TESL Canada Journal · doi:10.18806/tesl.v22i2.84 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Peer and AI Review + Reflection (PAIRR): A human-centered approach to formative assessment
Sperber, L., MacArthur, M., Minnillo, S., Stillman, N., & Whithaus, C. (2025) · Computers and Composition · doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2025.102921 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Ciampa, K., & Wolfe, Z. M. (2023) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2020.1822313 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Nemati, M., Alavi, S. M., & Mohebbi, H. (2019) · Language Testing in Asia · doi:10.1186/s40468-019-0084-9 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Rouhi, A., Dibah, M., & Mohebbi, H. (2020) · Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education · doi:10.1186/s40862-020-00093-z · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Jiang, J., & Yu, Y. (2014) · International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education · doi:10.4018/ijicte.2014070103 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ferris, D. R.
- Corresponding author
- Ferris, Dana R.
- ORCID
- Ferris, Dana R.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2003-02-26
- OpenAlex
- W4241444451
- Cited by
- 657
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 37 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 30
- FWCI
- 12.91
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- second language writing, teacher feedback, error correction, peer feedback, teacher-student conferences, ESL writing instruction, teacher professional development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review