The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
Studying Educational and Social Policy
Abstract
The overall purpose of this text is to introduce beginning researchers to the study of educational and social policy, how it has been examined from a scholarly perspective, and the salient issues to consider in conceptualizing and conducting policy research. The emphasis is on "introduce," as the various policy fields within the public sector (for example, education, energy, health, labor) are much too diverse to include in depth in a single volume on theoretical concepts and research methods. The focus is not so much on the substance of policymaking as on understanding the interplay between how policy is made and implemented and the various conceptual approaches and methods researchers can use to frame and conduct policy studies. The underlying assumption is that a critique of the substantive, theoretical, and methodological issues involved in studying policy can help researchers conduct policy studies that are more informative in guiding policy development and more effective in assessing the impact of policy reforms. *Part I acquaints readers with substantive issues and challenges related to the study of the policy process, and includes chapters on federalism and policymaking, and on studying policy development, implementation, and impact. *Part II examines different conceptual frameworks and theories for the study of policy, with chapters on political culture and policymaking, the punctuated-equilibrium theory and the advocacy coalition framework, economic and organization…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Policy scholars have shifted from the stance of policy analysis being an objective process to one that emphasizes transparency.
“Since policy issues are grounded in values, policy scholars have shifted from the stance of policy analysis being an objective process to one that emphasizes transparency [138].”
From Navigating the Ethical and Societal Impacts of Generative AI in Higher Computing Education (2025) · cites this paper as [138]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ontario's daily physical activity policy for elementary schools: is everything in place for success?
Robertson-Wilson, J. E., & Lévesque, L. (2009) · Canadian Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1007/bf03405521 · Cited by 23
Navigating the Ethical and Societal Impacts of Generative AI in Higher Computing Education
Mak, J., Nakatumba-Nabende, J., Clear, T., Clear, A., Abluwi, I., Andrei, O., Angeli, L., MacNeil, S., Oyelere, S. S., Hale Rattigan, M., et al. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education · doi:10.1145/3760545.3783975 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Heck, R. H.
- Corresponding author
- Heck, Ronald H.
- ORCID
- Heck, Ronald H.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2004-07-19
- OpenAlex
- W4241144657
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 0.40
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Education and Public Policy
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Keywords
- education policy, social policy, policy research, policy process, federalism, policy implementation, policy impact, political culture, punctuated equilibrium, advocacy coalition framework, feminist perspectives, critical theory, postmodernism, multilevel methods, growth models, research design, qualitative research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review