Cited by 71Public Policy and Administration ResearchEducation and Public PolicyEvaluation and Performance Assessment

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

Studying Educational and Social Policy

Heck, Ronald H.·2004·Routledge eBooks

Abstract

The overall purpose of this text is to introduce beginning researchers to the study of educational and social policy, how it has been examined from a scholarly perspective, and the salient issues to consider in conceptualizing and conducting policy research. The emphasis is on "introduce," as the various policy fields within the public sector (for example, education, energy, health, labor) are much too diverse to include in depth in a single volume on theoretical concepts and research methods. The focus is not so much on the substance of policymaking as on understanding the interplay between how policy is made and implemented and the various conceptual approaches and methods researchers can use to frame and conduct policy studies. The underlying assumption is that a critique of the substantive, theoretical, and methodological issues involved in studying policy can help researchers conduct policy studies that are more informative in guiding policy development and more effective in assessing the impact of policy reforms. *Part I acquaints readers with substantive issues and challenges related to the study of the policy process, and includes chapters on federalism and policymaking, and on studying policy development, implementation, and impact. *Part II examines different conceptual frameworks and theories for the study of policy, with chapters on political culture and policymaking, the punctuated-equilibrium theory and the advocacy coalition framework, economic and organization…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781410610430

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Policy scholars have shifted from the stance of policy analysis being an objective process to one that emphasizes transparency.

    “Since policy issues are grounded in values, policy scholars have shifted from the stance of policy analysis being an objective process to one that emphasizes transparency [138].”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Heck, R. H.
Corresponding author
Heck, Ronald H.
Venue
Routledge eBooks
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2004-07-19
OpenAlex
W4241144657
Cited by
71
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.40
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Education and Public Policy
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Keywords
education policy, social policy, policy research, policy process, federalism, policy implementation, policy impact, political culture, punctuated equilibrium, advocacy coalition framework, feminist perspectives, critical theory, postmodernism, multilevel methods, growth models, research design, qualitative research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review