The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
Constructing Measures
Abstract
Constructing Measures introduces a way to understand the advantages and disadvantages of measurement instruments, how to use such instruments, and how to apply these methods to develop new instruments or adapt old ones. The book is organized around the steps taken while constructing an instrument. It opens with a summary of the constructive steps involved. Each step is then expanded on in the next four chapters. These chapters develop the "building blocks" that make up an instrument--the construct map, the design plan for the items, the outcome space, and the statistical measurement model. The next three chapters focus on quality control. They rely heavily on the calibrated construct map and review how to check if scores are operating consistently and how to evaluate the reliability and validity evidence. The book introduces a variety of item formats, including multiple-choice, open-ended, and performance items; projects; portfolios; Likert and Guttman items; behavioral observations; and interview protocols.Each chapter includes an overview of the key concepts, related resources for further investigation and exercises and activities. Some chapters feature appendices that describe parts of the instrument development process in more detail, numerical manipulations used in the text, and/or data results. A variety of examples from the behavioral and social sciences and education including achievement and performance testing; attitude measures; health measures, and general sociolo…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tennant, A., & Conaghan, P. G. (2007) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/art.23108 · Cited by 1,654
Assessment in the age of artificial intelligence
Swiecki, Z., Khosravi, H., Chen, G., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Lodge, J. M., Milligan, S., Selwyn, N., & Gašević, D. (2022) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100075 · Cited by 409
Siddiq, F., Hatlevik, O. E., Olsen, R. V., Throndsen, I., & Scherer, R. (2016) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2016.05.002 · Cited by 269
Kump, B., Engelmann, A., Keßler, A., & Schweiger, C. (2018) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dty054 · Cited by 233
Acculturative family distancing (AFD) and depression in Chinese American families
Hwang, W.-C., Wood, J. J., & Fujimoto, K. (2010) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0020542 · Cited by 170
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, M.
- Corresponding author
- Wilson, Mark
- ORCID
- Wilson, Mark
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2004-12-13
- OpenAlex
- W4244055828
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 1.26
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
- Keywords
- instrument development, construct maps, item design, outcome space, reliability statistics, validity, item format, Guttman scale, behavioral observation, interview protocol, achievement tests, health outcome measures, Rasch analysis, item response theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review