The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
The Tolerability of Risk
Abstract
* Introduction * Part I - Concepts * Components of the Risk Governance Framework * The Risk Handling Chain * Wider Governance Issues * Part II - Experiences * A Historical Perspective on Tolerability of Risk * Tolerability of Risk: The Regulator's Story * Applying the HSE's Risk Decision Model: Reducing Risks, Protecting People * What Makes Tolerability of Risk Work? Exploring the Limitations of its Applicability to Other Risk Fields * Conclusion * Index
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While risk assessment frameworks cannot prove the absolute certainty of violence (Bouder et al., 2007), the structured nature of frameworks allows assessors to categorically evaluate the behaviors of increased threat.”
From Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence, Hate Speech, and Terrorism: A Risk Assessment on the Rise of the Incel Rebellion in Canada (2023) · cites this paper as Bouder et al., 2007
Citations
Cited by
Chan, E. (2023) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/10778012221125495 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2013-09-05
- OpenAlex
- W1516254132
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 2.68
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Risk and Safety Analysis
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Leadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies
- Keywords
- risk governance, risk governance framework, HSE, regulatory risk management, history of risk management, risk mitigation, occupational safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Tolerability of Risk. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781849773324
- The paper
- The Tolerability of Risk. (2013). Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849773324
