CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 5Academic integrity and plagiarismCorruption and Economic DevelopmentHigher Education Governance and Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Corruption in the post-plagiarism era: weaponizing reputation and morality in the name of integrity in higher education

Open access
Eaton, Sarah Elaine·2025·Handbook on Corruption in Higher Education
DOI 10.4337/9781035320240.00020
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4337/9781035320240.00020

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Eaton, S. E.
Corresponding author
Eaton, Sarah Elaine
ORCID
Eaton, Sarah Elaine
Venue
Handbook on Corruption in Higher Education
Publisher
Edward Elgar Publishing
Published
2025-09-22
Pages
146-161
DOI
10.4337/9781035320240.00020
OpenAlex
W4414227827
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5
FWCI
16.07
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Corruption and Economic Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Governance and Development
Keywords
corruption, plagiarism, academic integrity, academic reputation, morality, higher education, academic misconduct

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review