Cited by 31Public Policy and Administration ResearchPublic Administration and GovernanceAdministrative Law and Governance

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Contrasting Anglo-American and Continental European Civil Service Systems

Horton, Sylvia·2011·International Handbook on Civil Service Systems

Abstract

3 Contrasting Anglo-American and Continental European civil service systems Sylvia Horton 3.1 INTRODUCTION Several books on comparative civil services have appeared in recent years (Bekke et al. 1993a, 1993b; Pierre 1995; Page and Wright 1999; Bek...

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4337/9781781001080.00008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Horton, S.
Corresponding author
Horton, Sylvia
Venue
International Handbook on Civil Service Systems
Published
2011-12-29
OpenAlex
W2805747770
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Law › Administrative Law and Governance
Keywords
civil service system, public administration, bureaucracy, civil service reform

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review