Cited by 40Sustainable Development and Environmental PolicySustainable Development and Environmental ManagementSustainability and Climate Change Governance

Sustainability Science for Strong Sustainability

Open access
Dedeurwaerdere, Tom·2014·Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks

Abstract

Figures 1.1 Different types of production functions 1.2 Relative decoupling in OECD countries: 1975-2000 1.3 Direct Material Consumption (DMC) in some OECD countries: 1975-2000 1.4 Trends in fossil fuel consumption and related CO 2 emissions: 1980-2007 2.1 Conceptual model of an ideal-typical transdisciplinary research process 3.1 Linkages between ecosystem services and human well-being 3.2 Typology of socio-technical transition pathways 4.1 Successive iterations in companion modelling 5.1 Bibliometric analysis of articles on sustainability (I) 5.2 Bibliometric analysis of articles on sustainability (II)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4337/9781783474561

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 204 · Cited by 40

Research works printed but not linked: 86

  1. Arendt, H. (1958), The Human Condition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  2. Baker, S. and A. Mehmood (2014), 'Social innovation and the governance of sustainable places', Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, forthcoming.
  3. Baumgaertner, S. and M.F. Quaas (2010), 'What is sustainability econom- ics?', Ecological Economics, 69 (3), 445-50.
  4. Boulding, K.E. (1948), 'Samuelson's foundations: The role of mathematics in economics', Journal of Political Economy, 56 (3), 187-99.
  5. Brandt, P., A. Ernst, F. Gralla, C. Luederitz, D.J. Lang, J. Newig, F. Reinert, D.J. Abson and H. von Wehrden (2013), 'A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science', Ecological Economics, 92, 1-15.
  6. Brody, J.G., R. Morello-Frosch, P. Brown, R.A. Rudel, R. Gasior Altman, M. Frye, C.C. Osimo, C. Perez and L.M. Seryak (2007), 'Is it safe? New ethics for reporting personal exposures to environmental chemicals', American Journal of Public Health, 97, 1547-54.
  7. Brown, P., J. Green Brody, R. Morello-Frosch, J. Tovar, A.R. Zota and R.A. Rudel (2012), 'Measuring the success of community science: The Northern California household exposure study', Environmental Health Perspectives, 120 (3), 326-31.
  8. Calderone, J., K. Flynn, T. Robbins and R. Sugarman (1998), 'Asthma: the silent epidemic', New York Daily News, Special Series, February, pp. 22-6.
  9. Callicott, J.B. (1999), Beyond the Land Ethic: More Essays in Environmental Philosophy, New York: State University of New York Press.
  10. Campo, P., F. Bousquet and T.R. Villanueva (2010), 'Modelling with stake- holders within a development project', Environmental Modelling and Software, 25 (11), 1302-21.
  11. Chesbrough, H. (2006), Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  12. Chick, V. and S.C. Dow (2001), 'Formalism, logic and reality: a Keynesian analysis', Cambridge Journal of Economics, 25 (6), 705-21.
  13. Corburn, J. (2003), 'Bringing local knowledge into environmental decision- making: improving urban planning for communities at risk', Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22, 420-33.
  14. Corburn, J. (2005), Street Science: Community Knowledge and Environmental Health Justice, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  15. Deci, E.L. and R.M. Ryan (2000), 'The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior', Psychological Inquiry, 11 (4), 227-68.
  16. Dedeurwaerdere, T. (2013), 'Transdisciplinary sustainability science at higher education institutions: science policy tools for incremental insti- tutional change', Sustainability, 5 (9), 3783-801.
  17. Elzinga, A. (2008), 'Participation', in G. Hirsch Hadorn, H. Hoffmann- Riem, S. Biber-Klemm, W. Grossenbacher, D. Joye, C. Pohl, U. Wiesmann and E. Zemp (eds), Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research, Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 345-59.
  18. Enengel, B., A. Muharb, M. Penker, B. Freyer, S. Drlik and F. Ritter (2012), 'Co-production of knowledge in transdisciplinary doctoral theses on landscape development -An analysis of actor roles and knowledge types in different research phases', Landscape and Urban Planning, 105 (1-2), 106-117.
  19. Fontan, J.M., D. Harrisson and J.L. Klein (2013), 'Partnership-based research: coproduction of knowledge and contribution to social innova- tion', in F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood and A. Hamdouch (eds), The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 308-19.
  20. Gebbie, K., L. Rosenstock and L.M. Hernandez (2003), The Future of the Public's Health in the 21st Century, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  21. Gram, H. (2012), 'Openness versus closedness in classical and neoclassical economics', in H. Putnam and V. Walsh (eds), The End of Value-Free Economics, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 136-42.
  22. Granato, J., M. Lo and S.M.C. Wong (2010b), 'The empirical implications of theoretical models (EITM): a framework of methodological unifica- tion', Política y Gobierno, 17 (1), 25-57.
  23. Hammer, M., A.M. Jansson and B.O. Jansson (1993), 'Diversity change and sustainability -implications for the fisheries', Ambio, 22 (2-3), 97-105.
  24. Harding, A., B. Harper, D. Stone, C. O'Neill, P. Berger, S. Harris and J. Donatuto (2012), 'Conducting research with tribal communities: sovereignty, ethics, and data-sharing issues', Environmental Health Perspectives, 120 (1), 6-10.
  25. Heinelt, H. (2010), Governing Modern Societies, Abingdon: Routledge.
  26. Hirsch Hadorn, G., H. Hoffmann-Riem, S. Biber-Klemm, W. Grossenbacher, D. Joye, C. Pohl, U. Wiesmann and E. Zemp (eds) (2008), Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research, Berlin: Springer Verlag.
  27. Innes, J.E. and D.E. Booher (2010), Planning with Complexity. An Introduction to Collaborative Planning for Public Policy, Abingdon: Routledge.
  28. Jabbar, M.A., M.A. Saleem, A. Mohamed and H. Li-Pun (2001), 'Towards transdisciplinarity in technology and resource management research: a project in Ethiopia', Outlook on Agriculture, 30 (4), 257-60.
  29. Jaeger, C.C., J.D. Tàbara (2011), 'Concluding remarks', in C.C. Jaeger, J.D. Tàbara and J. Jaeger (eds), European Research on Sustainable Development, Volume 1: Transformative Science Approaches for Sustainability, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, pp. 205-208.
  30. Jaeger, J. (2009), 'Sustainability Science in Europe', paper prepared for DG Research, European Commission, Brussels, available at: http:// ec.europa.eu / research / sd / pdf / workshop-2009 / background _ paper_sust_ science_workshop_october_2009.pdf (accessed 6 February 2014).
  31. Jessop, B., F. Moulaert, L. Hulgård and A. Hamdouch (2013), 'Social innovation research: a new stage in innovation analysis?', in F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood and A. Hamdouch (eds), The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 110-30.
  32. Jones, P.T. and R. Jacobs (2007), Terra Incognita: Globalisering, Ecologie en Rechtwaardige Duurzaamheid, 2nd edn, Ghent: Academia Press.
  33. Kates, R.W., W.C. Clark, R. Corell, J.M. Hall, C.C. Jaeger, I. Lowe, J.J. McCarthy, H.J. Schellnhuber, B. Bolin, N.M. Dickson, S. Faucheux, G.C. Gallopin, A. Grübler, B. Huntley, J. Jaeger, N.S. Jodha, R.E. Kasperson, A. Mabogunje, P. Matson, H. Mooney, B. Moore III, T. O'Riordan and U. Svedin (2001), 'Sustainability science', Science, 292 (5517), 641-2.
  34. Lagabrielle, E., A. Botta, S. Aubert, W. Daré, D. David and C. Fabricius (2010), 'Modelling with stakeholders to integrate biodiversity conserva- tion with regional land-use planning: lessons learned in Réunion Island', Environmental Modelling and Software, 25 (11), 1413-27.
  35. Larkin, P.A. (1977), 'An epitaph for the concept of maximum sustained yield', Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 106 (1), 1-11.
  36. Lavergne, K.J., E.C. Sharp, L.G. Pelletier and A. Holtby (2010), 'The role of perceived government style in the facilitation of self-determined and non self-determined motivation for pro-environmental behavior', Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30 (2), 169-77.
  37. Ledogar, R.J., L. Garden-Acosta and A. Penchaszadeh (1999), 'Building international public health vision through local community research: the El Puente-CIET partnership', American Journal of Public Health, 89 (12), 1795-7.
  38. Ledogar, R.J., A. Penchaszadeh, C. Iglesias-Garden and L. Garden-Acosta (2000), 'Asthma and Latino cultures: different prevalence reported among groups sharing the same environment', American Journal of Public Health, 90 (6), 929-35.
  39. Lévesque, B. (2013), 'Social innovation in governance and public manage- ment systems: toward a new paradigm?', in F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood and A. Hamdouch (eds), The International Handbook on Social Innovation. Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 25-39.
  40. Lohmann, S. (2007), 'The trouble with multi-methodism', Newsletter of the American Political Science Association, 5 (1), 13-17.
  41. Lynam, T., J. Drewry, W. Higham and C. Mitchell (2010), 'Adaptive modelling for adaptive water quality management in the Great Barrier Reef region, Australia', Environmental Modelling and Software, 25 (11), 1291-301.
  42. Macho, G., I. Naya, J. Freire, S. Villasante and J. Molares (2013), 'The key role of Barefoot Fisheries Advisors in the co-managed TURF system of Galicia', Ambio, 42 (8), 1057-69.
  43. Maréchal, K. (2012), The Economics of Climate Change and the Change of Climate in Economics, London: Routledge.
  44. Matson, P. (2009), 'The sustainability transition', Issues in Science and Technology, 25 (4), 39-42.
  45. McCown, R.L. (2002), 'Changing systems for supporting farmers' Tom Dedeurwaerdere -9781783474561 Downloaded from https://www.elgaronline.com/ at 01/24/2025 10:44:50AM via Open Access. Open https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ decisions: problems, paradigms, and prospects', Agricultural Systems, 74 (1), 179-220.
  46. MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005), Ecosystems and Human Well-Being, Synthesis, Washington, DC: Island Press.
  47. Muraca, B. (2011), 'The map of moral significance', Environmental Values, 20 (3), 375-96.
  48. Muradian, M. and R. Rival (2012), 'Between markets and hierarchies: the challenge of governing ecosystem services', Ecosystem Services, 1(1), 93-100.
  49. National Academies (2004), 'Facilitating interdisciplinary research', Report of the Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research, Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy National Academies, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  50. Norgaard, R.B. (1994), Development Betrayed: The End of Progress and a Co-Evolutionary Revisioning of the Future, New York: Routledge.
  51. Osborne, S.P. and T. Gaebler (1993), Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector, New York: Penguin.
  52. Ostrom, E. (1990), Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge, UK and New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.
  53. Ostrom, E., M.A. Janssen and J.M. Anderies (2007), 'Going beyond Tom Dedeurwaerdere -9781783474561 Downloaded from https://www.elgaronline.com/ at 01/24/2025 10:44:50AM via Open Access. Open https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ panaceas', Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 104 (39), 15176-8.
  54. Popa, F., M. Guillermin and T. Dedeurwaerdere (2014), 'A pragmatist approach to transdisciplinarity in sustainability research: from complex systems theory to reflexive science, Futures (in press).
  55. Putnam, H. (2002), The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  56. Putnam, H. (2009), Ethics without Ontology, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  57. Putnam, H. and V. Walsh (2012), The End of Value-Free Economics, Abingdon: Routledge.
  58. Reeson, A. (2008), 'Institutions, motivations and public goods: theory, evi- dence and implications for environmental policy', Socio-Economics and the Environment in Discussion, CSIRO Working Chapter Series, available at: http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/csewpaper/2008-01.htm (accessed 11 February 2014).
  59. Reinke, S.J. and R.H. Walker (2005), 'Looking for Oz: Reflections on the journey towards university-community partnership', paper presented at the Teaching Public Administration Conference, 10-12 February, Florida.
  60. Ringquist, E.J. (2004), 'Environmental justice', in R.F. Durant, D.J. Fiorino and R. O'Leary (eds), Environmental Governance Reconsidered: Challenges, Choices and Opportunities, Cambridge, MA and London, UK: MIT Press, pp. 255-87.
  61. Rosenberg, A. (1975), 'The nomological character of microeconomics', Theory and Decision, 6 (1), 1-26.
  62. Scharpf, F.W. (1997), Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy, Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 52-4.
  63. Scher, E. (1999), 'Negotiating superfund cleanup at the Massachusetts Military Reservation', in L. Susskind, S. McKearnan and J. Thomas- Larmer (eds), The Consensus Building Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide to Reaching Agreement, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, pp. 859-78.
  64. Schneidewind, U. (2010), 'Ein institutionelles Reformprogramm zur Förderung transdisziplinärer Nachhaltigkeitsforschung', GAIA, 19 (2), 122-8.
  65. Seifer, S.D. and E. Greene-Moton (2007), 'Realizing the promise of CBPR: Community partners get organized!', Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education and Action, 1 (4), 291-4.
  66. Sen, A. (2009), The Idea of Justice, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  67. Sharif, N. (2006), 'Emergence and development of the National Innovations System concept', Research Policy, 35 (5), 745-66.
  68. Siegel, S., A. Ahram, J. Azari, A. Chhatre, B. Coggins, J. Grittersova, M. Ingram, M. Lieber, C. Metelits, T. Pepkinsky, A. Pieper, K. Sasikumar and P. Singh (2007), 'Trends in multi-method research: sailing ahead, reckoning with old risks and new', Qualitative Methods, 5 (1), 24-8.
  69. Simon, C. and M. Etienne (2010), 'A companion modelling approach applied to forest management planning', Environmental Modelling and Software, 25 (11), 1371-84.
  70. Smith, A., J.P. Voß and J. Grin (eds) (2010), 'Innovation studies and sus- tainability transitions: the allure of adopting a broad perspective, and its challenges', Research Policy, 39 (4), 435-48.
  71. Sober, E. (1986), 'Philosophical problems for environmentalism', in B. Norton (ed.), The Preservation of Species, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 173-94, reprinted in R. Elliot (ed.) (1994), Environmental Ethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press and in D. Schmidtz and E. Willott (eds) (2004), Environmental Ethics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  72. Sperling, L., J.A. Ashby, M.E. Smith, E. Weltzien and S. McGuire (2001), 'A framework for analysing participatory plant breeding approaches and results', Euphytica, 122 (3), 439-50.
  73. Thiry, G. (2012), 'Au-delà du PIB: Un tournant historique: Enjeux Tom Dedeurwaerdere -9781783474561 Downloaded from https://www.elgaronline.com/ at 01/24/2025 10:44:50AM via Open Access. Open https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ méthodologiques, théoriques et épistémologiques de la quantifica- tion', doctoral thesis, available at: http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/111496 (accessed 12 February 2014).
  74. Thompson Klein, J., W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, R. Häberli, A. Bill, R.W. Scholtz and M. Welti (2001), Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem Solving Among Science, Technology and Society, Basel: Springer Verlag.
  75. Van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. (2007), 'Abolishing GDP', TI Discussion Paper No. 07-019/3, available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers. cfm?abstract_id=962343 (accessed 12 February 2014).
  76. Van der Ploeg, J.D. (1993), 'Potatoes and knowledge', in M. Hobart (ed.), An Anthropological Critique of Development: The Growth of Ignorance, London: Routledge, pp. 209-27.
  77. Van de Ven, A., D.E. Polley, R. Garud and S. Venkataraman (1999), The Innovation Journey, New York: Oxford University Press.
  78. Vitousek, P., H. Mooney, J. Lubchenko and J. Melillo (1997), 'Human domination of the earth's ecosystems', Science, 277 (5325), 494-9.
  79. Voinov, A. and F. Bousquet (2010), 'Modelling with stakeholders', Environmental Modelling and Software, 25 (11), 1268-81.
  80. Wallerstein, N. and B. Duran (2010), 'Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity', American Journal of Public Health, 100 (Suppl. 1), 40-46.
  81. Weaver, P.M. (2011), 'Pragmatism and pluralism: creating clumsy and context-specific approaches to sustainability science', in C.C. Jaeger, J.D. Tàbara and J. Jaeger (eds), European Research on Sustainable Development, Volume 1: Transformative Science Approaches for Sustainability, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, pp. 173-86.
  82. Weaver, P.M. and J.L. Jansen (2004), 'Defining and evaluating "science for sustainability"', paper presented at the International Conference on Sustainability Engineering and Science, Auckland, July 2004, avail- able at: http://www.thesustainabilitysociety.org.nz/conference/2004/ Session5/63%20Weaver.pdf (accessed 12 February 2014).
  83. Wernette, D.R. and L.A. Nieves (1992), 'Breathing polluted air', EPA Journal, 18, 16-18.
  84. Wollmann, H. (2004), 'Local government reforms in Great Britain, Sweden, Germany and France: between multi-function and single- purpose organisations', Local Government Studies, 30 (4), 639-65.
  85. Worrapimphong, K., N. Gajaseni, C. LePage and F. Bousquet (2010), 'A companion modelling approach applied to fishery management', Environmental Modelling and Software, 25 (11), 1334-44.
  86. Malthus, Thomas Robert 85-86 Marshall, Alfred 82, 142 methodology of research reductionism 25, 34, 73, 81-82 and complex adaptive systems 25, 34-35 hypothetico-deductive research 25, 28 entanglement of facts and normative values 30-32, 78-79 and uncertainty 33, 37, 65, 139 extended peer review 37 Millenium Ecosystem Assessment 9, 4, 11, 12, 48-51 multi-method research 83, 87, 111, 112, 115, 123, 124, 133 National Science Foundation (US) 115, 118

Authors
Dedeurwaerdere, T.
Corresponding author
Dedeurwaerdere, Tom
Venue
Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks
Published
2014-09-26
OpenAlex
W1845241189
Cited by
40
References
204
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
4.88
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • BiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion)
  • Directory of Open access Books (OAPEN Foundation) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Directory of Open access Books (OAPEN Foundation) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • OAPEN (The OAPEN Foundation) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Gouvernement Wallon
  • European Commission (282625)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Keywords
strong sustainability, sustainability science, production function, decoupling, material consumption, fossil fuel consumption, CO2 emissions, transdisciplinary research, ecosystem services, human well-being, companion modelling, bibliometric analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review