The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The value of history and the history of value
Abstract
This chapter argues that Marxist economics cannot explain the present crisis because, as a discipline, it is not geared to. It is an oxymoron attempting fit Marxism to the methodological frame of marginalist neoclassical economics. The latter is antithetical to Marxism because it is ahistorical. In place of Marxist economics, this chapter proposes a geopolitical economy which exploits the resources of the historical the traditions of classical political economy and the critics of neoclassical economics in a way that enables us to view the present crisis in its historical and world perspective. It proceeds by first outlining a critique of Marxist economics and follows it up with a discussion of the variety of forms of capitalist crises. These discussions clear the ground for a historical view of value production and an understanding of the drivers of its own history. A full account of the present crisis being impossible here, the chapter closes with sketches of how geopolitical economy would approach two key elements of it: consumption demand and international capital flows.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
SYSTEMIC RECONSTRUCTION OF RUSSIA’S SOCIOECONOMIC SPACE
Kleiner, G. B. (2020) · Economic Revival of Russia · doi:10.37930/1990-9780-2020-2-64-59-69 · Cited by 50
DIGITIZATION AS A LOGICAL STAGE IN THE EVOLUTION OF AN ECONOMIC SYSTEM
Plotnikov, V. A. (2020) · Economic Revival of Russia · doi:10.37930/1990-9780-2020-2-64-104-115 · Cited by 30
NOONOMY, POSTINDUSTRIAL ECONOMY AND INDUSTRY 4.0: COMPARISON AND CONTRAST
Pavlov, M. Y. (2020) · Economic Revival of Russia · doi:10.37930/1990-9780-2020-2-64-152-162 · Cited by 25
NOONOMY AS THE KERNEL FOR THE FORMATION OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL AND WORLD ECONOMIC MODES
Minister for Basic Directions of Integration and Macroeconomics of the Eurasian Economic Commission, & Glazev, S. Y. (2020) · Economic Revival of Russia · doi:10.37930/1990-9780-2020-2-64-15-32 · Cited by 23
ORIGINS OF ESTABLISHING NIS.2 AND NOONOMY CONCEPTS IN THE ECONOMIC THEORY
Андреевич, М. Г. (2020) · Economic Revival of Russia · doi:10.37930/1990-9780-2020-2-64-142-151 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Desai, R.
- Corresponding author
- Desai, Radhika
- ORCID
- Desai, Radhika
- Venue
- The Great Financial Meltdown
- Publisher
- Edward Elgar Publishing
- Published
- 2016-06-24
- OpenAlex
- W2797306103
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 4.92
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Economy and Marxism
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economic Theory and Policy
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
- Keywords
- Marxian economics, critique of neoclassical economics, geopolitical economy, crisis of capitalism, value production, history of values, classical economics, consumer demand, international capital flows, methodological critique
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review