The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reproductive rights and justice: a multiple feminist theories account
Open accessAbstract
This chapter examines the impact of liberal feminism and critical race theory on reproductive rights and justice in the United States. Liberal feminism has played a key role in this fight. Other feminist theories, including, prominently, critical race theory, have taken the mainstream reproductive rights movement to task for marginalizing the voices and experience of women of color and low-income women, thus reinforcing stratified reproduction. This work has put issues like surrogacy, coerced sterilization, welfare family caps and criminal prosecution of pregnant women on the reproductive rights and justice agenda. Interaction among feminist theories has produced a dialectic and evolution that enable them to meet new challenges. Similarly, a multi-theory account of reproductive rights and justice issues produces a more useful analysis and range of strategies than a single theory approach.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As Ikemoto (2019) highlighted, the role of reproduction is a key aspect of patriarchy, with women bearing children and men not, leading to the justification of differential treatment in both domestic and public spheres.”
From From one-child policy to three-children initiative: a feminist critique of the population planning policies in China (2024) · cites this paper as Ikemoto, 2019
Citations
Cites
Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color
Crenshaw, K. (1991) · Stanford Law Review · doi:10.2307/1229039 · Cited by 32,792
Crenshaw, K. (2018) · Feminist Legal Theory · doi:10.4324/9780429500480-5 · Cited by 9,510
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhang, M., Zhang, C., & Liu, Y. (2024) · Communication, Culture & Critique · doi:10.1093/ccc/tcae014 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Ikemoto, L. C.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ikemoto, Lisa C.
- Venue
- Research Handbook on Feminist Jurisprudence
- Publisher
- Edward Elgar Publishing
- Published
- 2019-01-25
- OpenAlex
- W3122758885
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.71
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
- Keywords
- reproductive rights, reproductive justice, liberal feminism, critical race theory, women of color, low-income women, stratified reproduction, surrogacy, forced sterilization, feminist theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
