Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 288

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Schumpeter and the revival of evolutionary economics: an appraisal of the literature

Fagerberg, Jan·2018·Innovation, Economic Development and Policy

Abstract

During the last two decades we have seen a revival of interest in the works of Joseph Schumpeter and "evolutionary" ideas in economics more generally. A professional society honouring Schumpeter's name has been founded, and linked to it we have had for more than fifteen years now a professional journal devoted to this stream of thought. However, it has been argued that, despite these recent developments, the link between Schumpeter's own work and the more recent contributions to evolntionary economics is in fact rather weak. This paper considers this claim.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4337/9781788110266.00008

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 71 references

Cited by

See all 288

Metadata

Authors
Fagerberg, J.
Venue
Innovation, Economic Development and Policy
Published
2018-04-27
OpenAlex
W2070153097
Cited by
288
References
71
FWCI
68.56
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Schumpeter and the revival of evolutionary economics: an appraisal of the literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4337/9781788110266.00008
The paper
Fagerberg, J. (2018). Schumpeter and the revival of evolutionary economics: an appraisal of the literature. Innovation, Economic Development and Policy. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788110266.00008

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.