Cited by 2

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ethical economic practice

Streinzer, Andreas·2019·A Research Agenda for Economic Anthropology

Abstract

This chapter calls for a renewed focus on questions of value, distribution and fairness in economic anthropology. It revisits literature on ethical consumption, corporate social responsibility and solidarity economies and contrasts it with ethical economic practice from the Right. It claims that regressive value mobilisations are on the rise and calls for an analytic reorientation to make sense of their claims on things economic. It proposes three elements of such a reorientation: (1) a stress on ambivalence and everyday politics of value mobilisations, (2) a comparative and contrastive approach on ethical economic practices, and (3) a historical sensibility to explore genealogies and distant histories of how the economic and the political have been related to one another. The chapter proposes to engage with other sub-disciplines such as feminist anthropology and the anthropology of race to build alliances for understanding changing moral economies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4337/9781788116107.00013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Streinzer, A.
Venue
A Research Agenda for Economic Anthropology
Published
2019-07-26
Cited by
2
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review