The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The financialization of agricultural commodities: implications for food security
Abstract
This chapter outlines the ways in which financialization affects food systems and food security. It makes the case that the growing prominence of financial actors, institutions and motives in food systems creates dynamics that prioritize financial profits over other goals, including those related to food security. These developments can lead to excessive speculation in commodities futures markets that drive food prices higher, which has a disproportionate impact on the world’s poorest and most vulnerable populations. High levels of speculative trading in commodities futures markets has been implicated in the 2007-12 food price crisis, which saw food prices spike and an associated rise in world hunger. Similar dynamics are playing out in response to the war in Ukraine, and food prices have reached new highs. Heightened financialization in food systems is largely the product of a weakening of regulatory measures that govern commodity futures markets. The chapter concludes that stronger regulatory measures are required to rein in excessive speculation on agricultural commodities, thereby mitigating market dynamics that compromise food security.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The financialization of commodity markets has increased the influence and impact of financial actors in sectors such as food, fundamentally transforming price structures of essential goods.”
From Food Financialization: Impact of Derivatives and Index Funds on Agri-Food Market Volatility (2024) · cites this paper as Isakson et al. 2023
In the citing paper
“This phenomenon, characterized by the growing involvement of hedge funds, passive investment funds, and other financial entities, has altered the traditional supply-demand dynamics by introducing purely financial motivations and speculative strategies into food markets”
From Food Financialization: Impact of Derivatives and Index Funds on Agri-Food Market Volatility (2024) · cites this paper as Isakson et al. 2023
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Food Financialization: Impact of Derivatives and Index Funds on Agri-Food Market Volatility
Venegas, M. D. R., Feregrino, J., Lay, N., & Espinosa-Cristia, J. F. (2024) · International Journal of Financial Studies · doi:10.3390/ijfs12040121 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Isakson, S. R., Clapp, J., & Stephens, P.
- Venue
- Handbook of Food Security and Society
- Publisher
- Edward Elgar Publishing
- Published
- 2023-08-15
- Pages
- 202-214
- OpenAlex
- W4385802540
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 11.58
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
- Social Sciences › Development › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
- Keywords
- financialization, agricultural commodities, food security, commodity futures markets, speculation, food price volatility, Russian invasion of Ukraine, commodity market regulation, hunger
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review