Cited by 1Ethics and Social Impacts of AIDigitalization, Law, and RegulationLaw, AI, and Intellectual Property

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

AI developers, associations, and the academic community

Chinen, Mark·2023·The International Governance of Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Artificial intelligence developers, the professional associations that represent them, and academic institutions participate in the development and implementation of norms for artificial intelligence governance. Developers of artificial intelligence applications are in a unique position to make technical decisions that have broader impacts. Professional associations in which AI developers, academics and companies participate have recognized the need for the governance of artificial intelligence and have responded by developing ethical guidelines for AI and by participating in the development of other forms of governance at the international level. The university, part of whose mission is to engage in basic research, has also responded by establishing centers for the study of AI governance and is itself responsible for AI norms that have had some influence. Individual academics engage in international collaborations and provide their expertise to international governing bodies. At the same time, these actors are often in close relationships with private firms, often as employees, consultants, or recipients of funding. Finally, the norm of openness and the practice of developing technical tools detect and mitigate harms might not stem solely from these actors, but they have been championed by them. Openness seems to be well established through cross-border research collaborations, even in the face of national security concerns and by the adoption of open source practices at the international level.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4337/9781800379220.00011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chinen, M.
Corresponding author
Chinen, Mark
Venue
The International Governance of Artificial Intelligence
Published
2023-06-06
Pages
107-137
OpenAlex
W4379377672
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
1.24
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Keywords
AI governance, AI ethics guidelines, professional associations, academic institutions, AI developers, university-industry collaboration, harm mitigation, national security concerns, cross-border research collaboration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review