The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding System Innovations: A Critical Literature Review and a Conceptual Synthesis
Open accessAbstract
no abstract
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Geels, F. W. (2002) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00062-8 · Cited by 7,275
Self-citationTechnological paradigms and technological trajectories
Dosi, G. (1982) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6 · Cited by 6,685
Schot, J. (1998) · History and Technology · doi:10.1080/07341519808581928 · Cited by 227
On the role of outsiders in technical development
Van De Poel, I. (2000) · Technology Analysis & Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537320050130615 · Cited by 148
Cited by
Interactive components of digital MSMEs ecosystem for inclusive digital economy in Indonesia
Aminullah, E., Fizzanty, T., Nawawi, N., Suryanto, J., Pranata, N., Maulana, I., Ariyani, L., Wicaksono, A., Suardi, I., Azis, N. L. L., et al. (2024) · Journal of the Knowledge Economy · doi:10.1007/s13132-022-01086-8 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Geels, F. W.
- Venue
- System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability
- Publisher
- Edward Elgar Publishing
- Published
- 2004-11-26
- OpenAlex
- W1603450783
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.17
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding System Innovations: A Critical Literature Review and a Conceptual Synthesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4337/9781845423421.00012
- The paper
- Geels, F. W. (2004). Understanding System Innovations: A Critical Literature Review and a Conceptual Synthesis. System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845423421.00012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
