The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Asia’s Innovation Systems in Transition
Abstract
The success of Asian economies (first Japan, then Taiwan, South Korea, Singapore, Hong Kong and, more recently, China and India) has made it tempting to look for ‘an Asian model of development’. However, the strength of Asian development lies less in strategies that reproduce successful national systems of innovation and more in the capacity for institutional change to open up new development trajectories with greater emphasis on knowledge and learning. The select group of contributors demonstrate that although there are important differences among Asian countries in terms of institutional set-ups supporting innovation, government policies and industrial structures, they share common transitional processes to cope with the globalizing learning economy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
National innovation systems, capabilities and economic development
Fagerberg, J., & Srholec, M. (2008) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.06.003 · Cited by 829
Yeung, H. W.-C. (2009) · Regional Studies · doi:10.1080/00343400902777059 · Cited by 408
Regional innovation system, absorptive capacity and innovation performance: An empirical study
Lau, A. K. W., & Lo, W. (2015) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.11.005 · Cited by 273
Lundvall, B.-Å., & Rikap, C. (2022) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2021.104395 · Cited by 222
ENTREPRENEURSHIP, PROXIMITY AND REGIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEMS
STERNBERG, R. (2007) · Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9663.2007.00431.x · Cited by 102
Metadata
- Venue
- Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks
- Publisher
- Edward Elgar Publishing
- Published
- 2006-07-27
- OpenAlex
- W2116937055
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.69
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Asia’s Innovation Systems in Transition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4337/9781847201737
- The paper
- Asia’s Innovation Systems in Transition. (2006). Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847201737
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.