Cited by 43Vestibular and auditory disordersCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersNausea and vomiting management

Dizziness in the emergency department: an update on diagnosis

Open access
Spiegel, Rainer, Kirsch, Mark, Rosin, Christiane, Rust, Heiko, Baumann, Thomas, Sutter, Raoul, Hergen, Friedrich, Göldin, Martina +4 more·2017·Swiss Medical Weekly

Abstract

This review aims to assist emergency physicians in finding the underlying aetiology when a patient presents with dizziness to the emergency department. After reading this review, the emergency physician will be able to consider the most relevant differential diagnoses and have an idea about dangerous aetiologies that require immediate action. The emergency physician will also know what diagnostic steps need to be taken at what time, such as the three-component HINTS Test (Head Impulse, Nystagmus, and Test-of-Skew), which helps with distinguishing central from peripheral causes of the acute vestibular syndrome. Furthermore, episodic vestibular syndromes and chronic vestibular syndromes are discussed in detail. The five most frequent categories of dizziness are vasovagal syncope / orthostatic hypotension (22.3%), vestibular causes (19.9%), fluid and electrolyte disorders (17.5%), circulatory/pulmonary causes (14.8%) and central vascular causes (6.4%).Given that it would neither be economical nor practical to send all patients to specialists from the start, we present general guidelines for the diagnostic workup of patients presenting with dizziness to the emergency department. This review will focus on epidemiology, aetiologies, differential diagnoses and diagnostics. Treatment is described in a separate article.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4414/smw.2017.14565

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The differential diagnosis of patients presenting with unspecific, neurovegetative and autonomic symptoms is complex and involves a variety of diseases, including psychosomatic, neurologic, cardiologic, and endocrine disorders.

    “The differential diagnosis of patients presenting with unspecific, neurovegetative and autonomic symptoms is complex and involves a variety of diseases, including psychosomatic, neurologic, cardiologic, and endocrine disorders [1,2].”

    From An Uncommon Cause of Recurrent Presyncope, Dizziness, and Tachycardia: A Case Report of Diffuse, Adult-Onset Nesidioblastosis/Non-Insulinoma Pancreatogenous Hypoglycemia Syndrome (NIPHS) (2023) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Aetiology section describes a diverse differential diagnosis for dizziness, including psychosomatic, central vascular, circulatory and hypoglycaemic causes. The paper addresses patients presenting with dizziness, however, not patients presenting with unspecific neurovegetative or autonomic symptoms generally; it also does not identify endocrine disorders as a broad diagnostic category. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Strupp M, Kremmyda O, Bremova T, Teufel J. Aktuelles zur Phar- makotherapie von Schwindel und Nystagmus. Arzneimitteltherapie. 2013;31:147-55.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spiegel, R., Kirsch, M., Rosin, C., Rust, H., Baumann, T., Sutter, R., Hergen, F., Göldin, M., Müri, R., Kalla, R., Bingisser, R., & Mantokoudis, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • University of Bern (CH)
Venue
Swiss Medical Weekly
Published
2017-12-27
Volume
147
Issue
4950
Pages
w14565
ISSN
  • 0036-7672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1424-3997
OpenAlex
W2615048781
Cited by
43
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3
FWCI
0.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Swiss Medical Weekly (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nausea and vomiting management
Keywords
dizziness, emergency department, differential diagnosis, central vestibular disorders, peripheral vestibular disorders, vasovagal syncope, orthostatic hypotension, fluid and electrolyte disorders, diagnostic workup
MeSH terms
Diagnosis, Differential, Dizziness, Emergency Service, Hospital, Humans, Nystagmus, Pathologic, Vertigo, Vestibular Diseases, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review