Cited by 11Education, Achievement, and GiftednessEducation during COVID-19 pandemicCOVID-19 and Mental Health

The Impact of COVID-19 Distance Learning on Students’ Math Anxiety: An Exploratory Study

Open access
Doz, Daniel, Doz, Eleonora·2022·International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology

Abstract

In spring 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic forced a rapid shift to distance learning worldwide. Although recent research has focused on the impact that this transition had on students’ education and well-being, little has been done in particular on math education and on math anxiety (MA). Since MA is believed to be linked to the teaching methods, it could be hypothesized that the new learning environment affected MA levels. Thus, this study investigated whether students’ levels of MA evaluated before and during the first wave of the pandemic changed as a consequence of the distance learning implementation. Moreover, we were interested in investigating whether students’ satisfaction with the teaching methods, their effort in math, and their academic achievement were correlated to MA before and during the COVID-19 distance learning. Participants were 117 Italian middle and high school students. No significant differences between pre- and mid-pandemic MA were found when considering the entire sample. Analyzing separately, results indicated that high-MA students reported significantly lower MA levels during distance learning, however no difference was observed for moderate- and low-MA individuals. Furthermore, satisfaction with the teaching methods, effort in math, and math achievement were negatively correlated with MA, both before and during distance education.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.46328/ijemst.2219

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There was no difference observed for moderate and low mathematics anxiety students in the Doz and Doz study.

    “There was, however, according to Doz and Doz (2023), no difference observed for moderate and low mathematics anxiety students.”

    From COVID-19 Impact on College Algebra (2024) · cites this paper as Doz and Doz (2023)

  • Distance learning helped high mathematics anxiety students by reducing feelings of anxiousness during the pandemic.

    “While most studies revealed moderately high mathematics anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic and remote learning (Delima & Cahyawati 2021;Ludwig, 2021), on the other hand, Doz and Doz (2023) found that during the pandemic, the distance learning helped high mathematics anxiety students by reducing feelings of anxiousness.”

    From COVID-19 Impact on College Algebra (2024) · cites this paper as Doz and Doz (2023)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Doz, D., & Doz, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Primorska (SI)
  • University of Trieste (IT)
Venue
International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology
Published
2022-11-05
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
1-16
ISSN
2147-611X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4310188000
Cited by
11
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • ArTS Archivio della ricerca di Trieste (University of Trieste https://www.units.it/) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
mathematics anxiety, COVID-19 pandemic, distance education, online learning, mathematics achievement, middle and high school students, pre-pandemic vs pandemic comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review