The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Shaping High School Students' Motivation
Open accessAbstract
This study explores the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in high school education, focusing on its implications for student motivation and learning through the framework of Self-Determination Theory. As AI technologies like ChatGPT4 become more prevalent in educational settings, their potential to enhance learning by catering to students' needs for competence is significant. However, this investigation also highlights the challenges associated with AI misuse, which can undermine students' autonomy and relatedness, leading to academic dishonesty and superficial learning. The research underscores the importance of balancing technological advancements with ethical engagement and intrinsic motivation. Through qualitative analysis, including interviews and thematic analysis of student and teacher feedback, the study reveals a nuanced picture of AI's role in education. It suggests that while AI offers considerable benefits, its integration requires careful consideration of ethical use, digital literacy, and the cultivation of intrinsic motivation. The findings advocate for educational policies and practices that not only leverage AI's potential to enrich learning experiences but also address the challenges posed by its misuse. This study contributes to the ongoing discourse on technology in education, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach to AI integration that supports ethical standards and promotes a meaningful educational experience.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The 24/7 availability of personalized learning support enhances student confidence while reducing anxiety often associated with traditional instruction.
“The 24/7 availability of personalized learning support enhances student confidence while reducing anxiety often associated with traditional instruction [59,60].”
From Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A State-of-the-Art Overview of Pedagogical Integrity, Artificial Intelligence Literacy, and Policy Integration (2025) · cites this paper as [59]
AI tools contribute to increased intrinsic motivation, student autonomy, and psychological resilience.
“Artificial Intelligence tools also contribute to increased intrinsic motivation, student autonomy, and psychological resilience.”
From Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A State-of-the-Art Overview of Pedagogical Integrity, Artificial Intelligence Literacy, and Policy Integration (2025) · cites this paper as [59]
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 27,815 · see citing works
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 · Cited by 7,242 · see citing works
Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines
O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/1609406919899220 · Cited by 3,871 · see citing works
Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.246 · Cited by 1,762 · see citing works
Jang, H., Reeve, J., Ryan, R. M., & Kim, A. (2009) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0014241 · Cited by 713 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Such environments encourage students to explore, take initiative, and engage with learning materials on a deeper level, including technology and AI tools, thereby facilitating a more enriching educational experience (Jang et al., 2009).”
BackgroundThe rise of Big Data: what does it mean for education, technology, and media research?
Eynon, R. (2013) · Learning, Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2013.771783 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The effect of artificial intelligence tools on EFL learners' engagement, enjoyment, and motivation
Yuan, L., & Liu, X. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2024.108474 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Adamakis, M., & Rachiotis, T. (2025) · Encyclopedia · doi:10.3390/encyclopedia5040180 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Khampusaen, D. (2025) · LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network · doi:10.70730/pgcq9242 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
- Authors
- Alasgarova, R., & Rzayev, J.
- Affiliations
- ADA University (AZ)
- Venue
- International Journal of Technology in Education and Science
- Publisher
- ISTES Organization
- Published
- 2024-04-13
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 311-324
- ISSN
- 2651-5369 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4396908161
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 4
- FWCI
- 12.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Technology in Education and Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Technology and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in education, student motivation, high school students, self-determination theory, ChatGPT, academic dishonesty, AI misuse, intrinsic motivation, digital literacy, ethical use of AI, competence, autonomy, relatedness, superficial learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review