Evaluation of a formal wellness curriculum to reduce burnout in anesthesia residents: a pilot study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Long-term exhaustion and chronic occupational stress often result in physician burnout, which can have adverse consequences for patients, physicians, their families, and society. We hypothesized that increased engagement with a wellness curriculum would reduce the level of burnout, as measured by the Maslach Burnout Inventory Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS). METHODS: We created a yearlong multifaceted pilot wellness curriculum for anesthesia residents at our institution. All residents could experience the wellness curriculum regardless of enrollment in the study. Residents completed the MBI-HSS three times during the year and indicated the number of wellness events attended via web survey. We assessed the influence of different curriculum components and time on the trajectory of three MBI-HSS subscales: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment. RESULTS: Thirty-nine of 43 residents consented to participate in the study and completed at least one survey. Residents showed high levels of emotional exhaustion (mean 29.6; SD 11.14), depersonalization (12.8; 4.49), and personal accomplishment (45.0; 6.50) at baseline. Only personal accomplishment showed a significant increase over time (P < .036). Off-campus, wellness group sessions significantly decreased depersonalization (P = .001) and showed no difference in emotional exhaustion (P = .090). However, didactic workshops and wellness-related grand rounds failed to improve our measure of physician burnout, underscoring the need for alternative interventions to reduce this problem. CONCLUSIONS: A formal wellness curriculum that used classic didactic teaching methods was ineffective at decreasing resident burnout scores. Only wellness group meetings significantly reduced burnout measures. Our findings have important implications for planning future resident wellness interventions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Facilitated peer group discussions decreased depersonalization among healthcare providers, with results often extending several months after the intervention.
“Six studies, including 3 randomized control trials, examined these types of discussions and found that they decreased depersonalization among healthcare providers, with results often extending several months after the intervention.18-20,23-25”
From What do we really know about addressing burnout among healthcare workers? Maybe less than we think (2026) · cites this paper as [25]
The Methods describe facilitated discussions at resident wellness dinners, and the Results report lower depersonalization scores with each additional dinner attended. The study involved anesthesia residents and measured outcomes during a yearlong curriculum; it does not establish that the reduction persisted for several months after the intervention. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredFacilitated group discussions reduced depersonalization in two pre-post studies among residents and a mixed group of physicians, nurse practitioners, and certified nurse midwives.
“Facilitated group discussions were also observed to reduce depersonalization in two pre–post studies among residents25 and a mixed group of physicians, nurse practitioners, and certified nurse midwives.24”
From What do we really know about addressing burnout among healthcare workers? Maybe less than we think (2026) · cites this paper as [25]
There is no consistent evidence that implementing peer support through daily care team huddles, grief support, or employee recognition programs reduced burnout.
“we found no consistent evidence that implementing peer support through daily care team huddles, grief support, or employee recognition programs reduced burnout.10-12,14,15,25”
From What do we really know about addressing burnout among healthcare workers? Maybe less than we think (2026) · cites this paper as [25]
The Materials and Methods describe peer mentoring and quarterly wellness dinners, not daily care team huddles, grief support, or employee recognition programs. The Discussion reports that dinners significantly reduced depersonalization, but it does not evaluate the three named approaches; searches for those terms found no relevant passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Relationship Between Burnout and Professional Conduct and Attitudes Among US Medical Students
Dyrbye, L. N., Massie, F. S., Eacker, A., Harper, W., Power, D., Durning, S. J., Thomas, M. R., Moutier, C., Satele, D., Sloan, J., et al. (2010) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1318 · Cited by 896 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Shanafelt TD, Boone S, Tan L, et al. Burnout and satisfaction with work-life balance among US physicians relative to the general US population. Arch Intern Med 2012;172(18):1377-85.
- Dyrbye LN, Harper W, Durning SJ, et al. Patterns of distress in US medical students. Med Teach 2011;33(10):834-9.
- Saadat H, Snow DL, Ottenheimer S, et al. Wellness program for anesthesiology residents: a randomized controlled trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012;56(9):1130-8.
- Maslach C, Jackson SE, Leiter MP. Maslach Burnout Inventory, In: Zalaquett CP, Wood RJ (Eds.). Evaluating Stress: A Book of Resources. 3 rd ed. Scarecrow Education, Lanham, MD,1997;191- 218.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What do we really know about addressing burnout among healthcare workers? Maybe less than we think
Goetzel, R. Z., Fazen, L. E., Kent, K. B., Roemer, E. C., & Saldanha, I. J. (2026) · Health affairs scholar · doi:10.1093/haschl/qxag041
- Authors
- Brainard, A., Ziniel, S. I., Zuk, J., Dingmann, C., & Janosy, N. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Education in Perioperative Medicine
- Publisher
- Society for Education in Anesthesia
- Published
- 2019-01-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- E631-E631
- ISSN
- 2333-0406 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6683764
- OpenAlex
- W2982639788
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 1.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Education in Perioperative Medicine (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001082)
- National Center for Research Resources
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
- Keywords
- physician burnout, wellness curriculum, anesthesiology residents, emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, personal accomplishment, Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey, educational workshops, grand rounds, occupational stress, residency training
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review