Cited by 10BIM and Construction Integration3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications

Scan to BIM for the Semi-Automated Generation of a Material Passport for an Existing Building

Open access
Honic, Meliha, Kovacic, Iva, Gilmutdinov, Ildar, Wimmer, Michael·2020·CIB W78 Proceedings

Abstract

The construction sector has a large negative impact on the environment due to its wasteful treatment of raw materials.To minimize the raw materials consumption, increasing recycling rates through reusing or recycling materials in existing stocks is of utmost importance.However, the main obstacle in the recycling of existing building stocks is the lack of information about materials incorporated in buildings.This work presents the ongoing research within the multidisciplinary research project SCI_BIM, which received funding by the Austrian federal ministry of transport, innovation and technology.Within this paper, the semi-automated generation of an as-built BIM-Model for an existing building as well as the generation of a Material Passport (MP) is tested.In order to obtain the geometry and material information, laser scanners (geometry) and a Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR, for materials) are used.Thereby, first, a semi-automated BIM-Model is generated from the point cloud, which was obtained from the laser scans.Finally, the material information obtained from the GPR is integrated into the BIM-Model for the compilation of the MP.First results show that the generation of the MP for the use case is possible, but confronted with manual steps, such as integrating material information from different sources (e.g.analysis of demolition experts).The results of this paper should serve as a basis for the creation of a secondary raw materials cadastre in order to enable recycling of valuable materials, thus supporting the achievement of the EU goals 20-20-20.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.46421/2706-6568.37.2020.paper024

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Arikan, M., Schwärzler, M., Flöry, S., Wimmer, M., and Maierhofer, S. (2013). O-snap: Optimization-based snapping for modeling architecture. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 32(1), pp. 1-15.
  2. Bribián, I.Z., Capilla, A.V., and Usón, A.A. (2011). Life cycle assessment of building materials: Comparative analysis of energy and environmental impacts and evaluation of the eco-efficiency improvement potential. Building and Environment, 46(5), pp. 1133-1140.
  3. Brunner, P. H. (2011). Urban mining a contribution to reindustrializing the city. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 15(3), pp. 339-341.
  4. Hong, S., Jung, J., Kim, S., Cho, H., Lee, J., and Heo, J. (2015). Semi-automated approach to indoor mapping for 3D as-built building information modeling. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 51, pp. 34-46.
  5. Honic, M., Kovacic, I., Sibenik, G., and Rechberger, H. (2019). Data-and stakeholder management framework for the implementation of BIM-based Material Passports. Journal of building engineering, 23, pp. 341-350.
  6. Jung, J., Stachniss, C., Ju, S., and Heo, J. (2018). Automated 3D volumetric reconstruction of multiple-room building interiors for as-built BIM. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 38, pp. 811-825.
  7. Klinglmair, M., and Fellner, J. (2010). Urban mining in times of raw material shortage: Copper management in Austria during World War I. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 14(4), pp. 666-679.
  8. Kovacic, I., and Honic, M. (2019). BIM-supported scanning and data capturing for Integrated Resources and Energy Assessment. CIB WBC Conference 2019, Hongkong.
  9. Monszpart, A., Mellado, N., Brostow, G. J., and Mitra, N. J. (2015). RAPter: rebuilding man-made scenes with regular arrangements of planes. ACM Trans. Graph., 34(4), pp. 103-1.
  10. Suzuki, S., and Abe, K. (1985). Topological structural analysis of digitized binary images by border following. Computer vision, graphics, and image processing, 30(1), pp. 32- 46.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Honic, M., Kovacic, I., Gilmutdinov, I., & Wimmer, M.
Affiliations
TU Wien (AT)
Venue
CIB W78 Proceedings
Published
2020-08-18
Pages
338-346
ISSN
2706-6568 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3047225828
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.65
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
CIB W78 conference series (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › BIM and Construction Integration
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications
Keywords
scan-to-BIM, material passports, existing buildings, semi-automated data extraction, building information modeling, 3D scanning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review