Cited by 18Industrial and Mining SafetyIndustrial Automation and Control SystemsSafety Systems Engineering in Autonomy

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Safety requirements for mining systems controlled in automatic mode

Open access
·2020·Acta Montanistica Slovaca

Abstract

For machines working in an integrated way, as is the case of automated mining systems, the challenge is to design the control system to ensure implementation of all the functions required both for individual machines and ensure their proper interaction.While the requirements for machines of a given type are defined in relevant standards, the requirements for the linkage among them within mining systems, controlled in an automatic mode, are not always sufficiently specified in regulations and standard documents.Safety related to the control system of mining systems depends on the proper design of each machine and device, the realisation of technological interlocks and interdependencies among them within the complex, as well as on the proper design of the master control system.The master control systems, using digital transmission, enable a remote parameterisation of the control system, a parameterisation of electrical circuit protection settings and deactivation and activation of any input and output signals that are used in the control algorithm.On the basis of the experience gained during the evaluation of such systems, the principles that should be applied in order to avoid the occurrence of a hazard or risk increase associated with the use of master control systems are briefly discussed.This article reviews currently binding technical requirements for machines and their control systems and indicates a number of issues that should be taken into account in the process of designing control systems in order to ensure the required level of safety while using machines operating in an integrated manner within automated mining systems.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.46544/ams.v25i3.13

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Venue
Acta Montanistica Slovaca
Published
2020
Volume
25
Pages
417-436
ISSN
1335-1788 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4251850479
Cited by
18
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6
FWCI
3.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Acta Montanistica Slovaca (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Industrial and Mining Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Industrial Automation and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
Keywords
mine safety, machine control system, master control system, interlocks, safety requirements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review