PERFORMANCE ESTRATÉGICA Y ECONÓMICA DE EMPRESAS ESTATALES: EL CASO DE LAS AEROLINEAS LATINOAMERICANAS
Open accessAbstract
Seeks to develop new methods to identify objectives and evaluate the performance of state-owned companies, as well as to compare their performance with that of private companies. Comprises the operations between 1981 and 1987 of 17 airlines classified as: public Latin American, private Latin American and North American with operations in Latin America. First, the Delphi method is applied to identify the objectives and criteria for evaluating the performance of public airlines. Secondly, new methods for performance evaluation are evaluated using Data Envelopment Analysis. The third part is devoted to comparative performance studies and their implications for management and public policy formulation; the tools developed in the previous stages are used to relate ownership, international competition and efficiency. The results of the study indicate that the privatization strategies applied may produce some, but modest, efficiency gains. More fruitful might be to consider other strategies that allow moving up the entire efficiency frontier, such as some deregulation of domestic and international markets.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These studies do not provide strong evidence that privatisation improves efficiency.
“However, these studies do not provide strong evidence that privatisation improves efficiency (Gallegos-Monteagudo, 1992).”
From Airports’ public infrastructure and sources of inefficiency (2023) · cites this paper as Gallegos-Monteagudo, 1992
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 5 · Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- CAMERON, K. y D. WHETTEN, Organizational effectiveness: a comparison of multiple models, Nueva York, Academic Press, 1983,
- CHARNES, A., COOPER W. W. y E. RHODES, "Measuring the efficiency ofdecisión making units", European Journal of Operational Research, q420AdA, 1978, CHILD, J, "Management and orga: nizalional fuctors associated with company performance-part 1", Journal of Management Studies, Mi: 175-189, 1974, --=-, "Management and organizational factors associated with company performance-part 11%, Journal of Management Studies, 12: 12-27, 1975,
- CHURCHILL, N, €. y otros, "Deve- lopment in comprehensive auditing and suggestions for rescarch", Reprint Series, Harvard Universily, 1977, Proceedings of he Second Symposium on Auditing Rescarch, DALKEY, N, €. y O, HELMER, "An experimental application of ihe Del- phi method lo the use of experts", Management Science, Y: 458-467, 1963,
- GOODMAN, P. $., PENNINGS, J. M. y olros, New perspectives on orga- nizational effectiveness, San Fran- cisco, Josse y Bass Publishers, 1977, MILES, E., y €. SNOW, Organization strategy, structure and process, Nueva York, McGraw Hill, 1978.
- MILLWARD, R., "The comparative performance of public and private ownership", en R. of Ipsden (ed.), The mixed economy, London, Macmillan Press, 1982, pp. 58-93.
- PORTER, M., Competitive strategy; techniques for analyzing industries and competitors, Nueva York, Free Press, 1980,
- RUMELT, R., Strategy, structure and economic performance, Boston, Harvard Business School Press, 1974,
- ZAMUTO, R. F., Assessing orga- nizational elfectiveness, Albany, Slate University ol New York Press, 1982,
- Authors
- Gallegos Monteagudo, A.
- Venue
- Cuadernos de difusión
- Publisher
- Universidad ESAN
- Published
- 1992-03-30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 93-99
- ISSN
- 1815-6592 (ISSN-L)
- 1815-6606
- OpenAlex
- W3199261279
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Cuadernos de difusión (publishedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Aviation Industry Analysis and Trends
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Transport and Economic Policies
- Keywords
- state-owned enterprises, airline performance, Latin American airlines, privatization, public vs private companies, performance standards, data envelopment analysis, efficient frontier, airline deregulation, international competition, public policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
