The DOI matches its Crossref record.
JBI Reviewer's Manual PDF
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Data charting followed a standardized data extraction form [38] and allowed for refinements according to information emerging during the review stage, as the iterative process of data extraction in scoping reviews is conducive to this [39].”
From Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and the Internet of Things: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as [38]
In the citing paper
“Critical appraisal was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools appropriate for each study design [14].”
From Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in the Gulf Cooperation Council: Acute-Care Utilization and Medication Adherence: A PRISMA-ScR Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“Data analysis was primarily descriptive in nature, as scoping reviews are exploratory and aim to identify the extent of current available evidence and summarize it, rather than synthesize results [32,39]. Along with frequency counting, a descriptive qualitative approach was favored for retrieved qualitative studies, using basic coding of data to organize these into categories, focusing on identify”
From Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and the Internet of Things: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as [38]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fernandez, R. S., Lord, H., Halcomb, E., Moxham, L. J., Middleton, R., Alananzeh, I. M., & Ellwood, L. (2020) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103637 · Cited by 797
Built Environment Design and People with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD): A Scoping Review
Tola, G., Talu, V., Congiu, T., Bain, P. A., & Lindert, J. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18063203 · Cited by 104
Drummond, D., & Gonsard, A. (2024) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/58504 · Cited by 95
Wishes and Needs of Nursing Home Residents: A Scoping Review
Schweighart, R., O’Sullivan, J. L., Klemmt, M., Teti, A., & Neuderth, S. (2022) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare10050854 · Cited by 48
Ahn, S., Cho, S., & Choi, N. (2021) · Marine Drugs · doi:10.3390/md19010026 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Aromataris, E., & Munn, Z.
- Venue
- JBI eBooks
- Publisher
- JBI
- Published
- 2020
- OpenAlex
- W3034528076
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 46 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 5.46
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- JBI eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Writing and Publishing
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
