The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Researchers and their ‘subjects’: Ethics, power, knowledge and consent
Abstract
This book examines the role of participants in research and how research ethics can be put into practice. Health, social, and journalistic research are currently subject to very different forms of regulation and codes of practice. By including the experiences of researchers and their subjects, the book explores the disciplinary divides.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Huntley, A. L., Potter, L., Williamson, E., Malpass, A., Szilassy, E., & Feder, G. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021960 · Cited by 194
Putra, B. A. (2023) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci12030157 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Venue
- Bristol University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Policy Press
- Published
- 2004-10-13
- OpenAlex
- W4205860331
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Bristol University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Keywords
- research ethics, research participants, participant experiences, health research, social research, journalism research, research regulation, code of practice, disciplinary divide
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
