CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 7,594Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsQualitative Comparative Analysis ResearchMethodology and Impact of Social Science Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers

Open access
Baxter, Pamela, Jack, Susan·2015·The Qualitative Report
DOI 10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Qualitative case study methodology provides tools for researchers to study complex phenomena within their contexts. When the approach is applied correctly, it becomes a valuable method for health science research to develop theory, evaluate programs, and develop interventions. The purpose of this paper is to guide the novice researcher in identifying the key elements for designing and implementing qualitative case study research projects. An overview of the types of case study designs is provided along with general recommendations for writing the research questions, developing propositions, determining the “case” under study, binding the case and a discussion of data sources and triangulation. To facilitate application of these principles, clear examples of research questions, study propositions and the different types of case study designs are provided.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Baxter, P. (2000). An exploration of student decision making as experienced by second year baccalaureate nursing students in a surgical clinical setting. Unpublished master's thesis, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON.
  2. Baxter, P., & Rideout, L. (2006). Decision making of 2nd year baccalaureate nursing students. Journal of Nursing Education, 45(4), 121-128.
  3. Russell, C., Gregory, D., Ploeg, J., DiCenso, A., & Guyatt, G. (2005). Qualitative research. In A. DiCenso, G. Guyatt, & D. Ciliska (Eds.), Evidence-based nursing: A guide to clinical practice (pp. 120-135). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 7,594

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Baxter, P., & Jack, S.
Affiliations
McMaster University (CA)
ORCID
Venue
The Qualitative Report
Publisher
Nova Southeastern University
Published
2015-01-14
ISSN
  • 1052-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 2160-3715
DOI
10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573
OpenAlex
W2131919497
Cited by
7,594
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 142 · 2025: 323 · 2024: 503 · 2023: 517 · 2022: 491 · 2021: 764 · 2020: 754 · 2019: 754 · 2018: 625 · 2017: 645 · 2016: 595 · 2015: 468
FWCI
3854.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • The Qualitative Report (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Methodology and Impact of Social Science Research
Keywords
qualitative case study, case study design, novice researchers, research questions, case selection, triangulation, data sources, health research, theory development, program evaluation, intervention development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review