CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 223Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsQualitative Research Methods and EthicsEducational Research and Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Data Saturation: The Mysterious Step In Grounded Theory Method

Open access
Aldiabat, Khaldoun, Le Navenec, Carole-Lynne·2018·The Qualitative Report
DOI 10.46743/2160-3715/2018.2994
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to provide a discussion that is broad in both depth and breadth, about the concept of data saturation in Grounded Theory. It is expected that this knowledge will provide a helpful resource for (a) the novice researcher using a Grounded Theory approach, or for (b) graduate students currently enrolled in a qualitative research course, and for (c) instructors who teach or supervise qualitative research projects. The following topics are discussed in this paper: (1) definition of data saturation in Grounded Theory (GT); (2) factors pertaining to data saturation; (3) factors that hinder data saturation; (4) the relationship between theoretical sampling and data saturation; (5) the relationship between constant comparative and data saturation; and (6) illustrative examples of strategies used during data collection to maximize the components of rigor that Yonge and Stewin (1988) described as Credibility, Transferability or Fittingness, Dependability or Auditability, and Confirmability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.46743/2160-3715/2018.2994

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Aldiabat, K., & Le Navenec, C. (2011a). Philosophical roots of classic grounded theory: Its foundations in symbolic interactionism. The Qualitative Report, 16(4), 1063-1080. Retrieved from http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol16/iss4/9
  2. Chenitz, W. (1986). Getting started: The research proposal for a grounded theory study. In W. Chenitz & J. Swanson (Eds.), From practice to grounded theory: Qualitative research in nursing (pp. 39-47). Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
  3. Conrad, C., Neumann, A., Haworth, J. G., & Scott, P. (1993). Qualitative research in higher education: Experiencing alternative perspective and approaches. Needham Heights, MA: Ginn Press.
  4. Glaser, B. G. (1969). The constant comparative analysis of qualitative analysis. In G. J. McCall & J. L. Simmons (Eds.), Issues in participant observation: A text and reader (pp. 216- 228). Menlo Park, CA: Addison -Wesley.
  5. Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  6. Wilson, H.S. (1985). Research in Nursing. Menlo Park, Calif. : Addison-Wesley: Addison- Wesley.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 223

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Aldiabat, K., & Le Navenec, C.-L.
Affiliations
  • University of New Brunswick (CA)
  • University of Calgary
Corresponding author
Aldiabat, Khaldoun
ORCID
Aldiabat, Khaldoun
Venue
The Qualitative Report
Publisher
Nova Southeastern University
Published
2018-01-26
ISSN
  • 1052-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 2160-3715
DOI
10.46743/2160-3715/2018.2994
OpenAlex
W2784411250
Cited by
222
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6
FWCI
79.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • The Qualitative Report (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
Keywords
data saturation, grounded theory, theoretical sampling, constant comparative method, qualitative research rigor, credibility, transferability, dependability, auditability, confirmability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review