The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A LONGITUDINAL INVESTIGATION OF CROWD DENSITY AND THE HOME COURT PHENOMENON IN THE WOMEN’S NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION
Abstract
The home team advantage has been extensively documented and studied in many team sports, especially men’s basketball leagues. In contrast, research that has examined the home court advantage in women’s basketball leagues could not be found. Therefore, this study was designed to answer the following questions: (1) is the home court advantage present in the woman’s national basketball association (WNBA)? (2) is there a relationship between crowd density and referee bias in favor of the home team in the national woman’s basketball league? (3) is there a relationship between crowd density and home team performance in the woman’s national basketball league? The study at hand employed a longitudinal study approach to examine 5 regular seasons (2015-2019) of 10 WNBA teams. Data for fan attendance, sport arena capacity, and box scores were collected from public domains. Statistical calculations and analysis were used to compare chosen box scores between the home team and away team. Similarly, chosen box scores were compared between home games that had a crowd density above 50% and home games that had a crowd density below 50%. The results of this study showed that the home court advantage was present in the woman’s national basketball league. In contrast to research studies that examined referee bias in men’s basketball leagues, the results of this study are conflicting and inconclusive. However, home games that had crowd density above 50% significantly outperformed home games that had crowed density below 50%, both offensively (p=0.003) and defensively (p=0.002). Article visualizations:
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Out of the 25 articles, only one explored home advantage at women’s level at the WNBA [47].”
From The Influence of Home-Court Advantage in Elite Basketball: A Systematic Review (2024) · cites this paper as [47]
In the citing paper
“Home teams exhibited superior offensive and defensive efficiency thanks to the impact of large crowds [47].”
From The Influence of Home-Court Advantage in Elite Basketball: A Systematic Review (2024) · cites this paper as [47]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Influence of Home-Court Advantage in Elite Basketball: A Systematic Review
Mochales Cuesta, I., Jiménez-Sáiz, S. L., Kelly, A. L., & Bustamante-Sánchez, Á. (2024) · Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology · doi:10.3390/jfmk9040192 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Orton, S., Maggio, P., & DeBeliso, M.
- Venue
- European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science
- Publisher
- Open Access Publishing Group
- Published
- 2022-08-02
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 2501-1235
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A LONGITUDINAL INVESTIGATION OF CROWD DENSITY AND THE HOME COURT PHENOMENON IN THE WOMEN’S NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.46827/ejpe.v8i6.4392
- The paper
- Orton, S., Maggio, P., & DeBeliso, M. (2022). A LONGITUDINAL INVESTIGATION OF CROWD DENSITY AND THE HOME COURT PHENOMENON IN THE WOMEN’S NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejpe.v8i6.4392
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.