The development of juvenile-typical patterns of play fighting in juvenile rats does not depend on peer-peer play experience in the peri-weaning period
Open accessAbstract
Play fighting in rats involves attack and defense of the nape. To protect the nape, rats use a variety of defensive tactics, with different strains having specific preferences. Targeting of the nape is established before weaning and defense matures over the course of the week preceding and the week proceeding weaning. Thus, it is possible that experience from engaging in immature forms of play is needed to consolidate the nape as the playful target and for the development of the juvenile-typical pattern of defense. Two experiments were conducted to evaluate this possibility. For the first experiment, male rats were reared over the week post-weaning in either pairs or alone, and their play tested with unfamiliar partners when juveniles (31-34 days). For the second experiment, during the week preceding weaning, male and female rats were placed into one of three conditions: (1) with the mother and no peers, (2) with same-sex siblings but no mother or (3) with both the mother and same-sex siblings. The subjects were tested in same-sex, same-condition pairs when juveniles (31-34 days). Rats from all conditions, in both experiments, attacked the nape during play fighting and developed the same juvenile-typical patterns of playful defense. This suggests that the experience of peer-peer play in the peri-weaning period is not necessary for the development of the attack and defense components of juvenile-typical play.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Once play begins at around 17 days of age, it takes about 10 days for the repertoire of tactics used during play to mature fully.
“once play begins at around 17 days of age, it takes about 10 days for the repertoire of tactics used during play to mature fully”
From The rough-and-tumble play of rats as a natural behavior suitable for studying the social brain (2022) · cites this paper as Himmler et al., 2015
The maturation of the play tactic repertoire appears to be little influenced by rearing experiences.
“this maturation appears to be little influenced by rearing experiences (Himmler et al., 2015).”
From The rough-and-tumble play of rats as a natural behavior suitable for studying the social brain (2022) · cites this paper as Himmler et al., 2015
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 80 · Cited by 18
- Authors
- Himmler, B. T., Himmler, S. M., Stryjek, R., Modlińska, K., Pisula, W., & Pellis, S. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Lethbridge (CA)
- Institute of Psychology (PL)
- Venue
- International Journal of Comparative Psychology
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- 28
- ISSN
- 0889-3667 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-3344
- OpenAlex
- W209045025
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 80
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 4.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- International Journal of Comparative Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Alberta Innovates - Health Solutions
- Alberta Innovates
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Keywords
- play fighting, young rats, defensive behavior, peer play, social experience, maternal care, social development (developmental psychology)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review