Cited by 18Primate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and ReproductionChild and Animal Learning Development

The development of juvenile-typical patterns of play fighting in juvenile rats does not depend on peer-peer play experience in the peri-weaning period

Open access
Himmler, B. T., Himmler, S. M., Stryjek, R., Modlińska, K., Pisula, W., Pellis, S. M.·2015·International Journal of Comparative Psychology

Abstract

Play fighting in rats involves attack and defense of the nape. To protect the nape, rats use a variety of defensive tactics, with different strains having specific preferences. Targeting of the nape is established before weaning and defense matures over the course of the week preceding and the week proceeding weaning. Thus, it is possible that experience from engaging in immature forms of play is needed to consolidate the nape as the playful target and for the development of the juvenile-typical pattern of defense. Two experiments were conducted to evaluate this possibility. For the first experiment, male rats were reared over the week post-weaning in either pairs or alone, and their play tested with unfamiliar partners when juveniles (31-34 days). For the second experiment, during the week preceding weaning, male and female rats were placed into one of three conditions: (1) with the mother and no peers, (2) with same-sex siblings but no mother or (3) with both the mother and same-sex siblings. The subjects were tested in same-sex, same-condition pairs when juveniles (31-34 days). Rats from all conditions, in both experiments, attacked the nape during play fighting and developed the same juvenile-typical patterns of playful defense. This suggests that the experience of peer-peer play in the peri-weaning period is not necessary for the development of the attack and defense components of juvenile-typical play.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.46867/ijcp.2015.28.00.10

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 80 · Cited by 18

Authors
Himmler, B. T., Himmler, S. M., Stryjek, R., Modlińska, K., Pisula, W., & Pellis, S. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Lethbridge (CA)
  • Institute of Psychology (PL)
Venue
International Journal of Comparative Psychology
Published
2015
Volume
28
ISSN
  • 0889-3667 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-3344
OpenAlex
W209045025
Cited by
18
References
80
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • International Journal of Comparative Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Alberta Innovates - Health Solutions
  • Alberta Innovates
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
play fighting, young rats, defensive behavior, peer play, social experience, maternal care, social development (developmental psychology)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review