CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2Education and Critical Thinking DevelopmentLegal Education and Practice InnovationsComparative and International Law Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Socio-Cultural Factors of the Effective use of Critical Thinking in the Development of Modern Legal Knowledge

Open access
Nuritdinov, Navruz·2024·Pubmedia Social Sciences and Humanities
DOI 10.47134/pssh.v2i2.294
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In the effective use of critical thinking in the development of modern legal knowledge, socio-cultural factors are of great importance. These factors shape the ways in which lawyers and scientists approach problems, interpret laws, and implement solutions. Educational systems that prioritize critical thinking skills in curricula, especially in law schools, produce skilled graduates in analytical thinking and problem solving.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.47134/pssh.v2i2.294

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Норматова Д. Введение личных и общественных отношений в взглядах Абу Райхана Беруни //Общество и инновации. – 2022. – Т. 3. – №. 4/S. – С. 528-533. · DOI
  2. Норматова Д. ДИН ФАЛСАФАСИДА ИНСОН ВА УНИНГ ЖАМИЯТДАГИ ЎРНИ //Research Focus. – 2022. – Т. 1. – №. 2. – С. 289-295.Норматова Д. Введение личных и общественных отношений в взглядах Абу Райхана Беруни //Общество и инновации. – 2022. – Т. 3. – №. 4/S. – С. 528-533. · DOI
  3. Normatova D. E. Normatova, Dildor Esonalievna. PECULIARITIES OF ANTHROPOCENTRISM AND HUMANISM OF THE SOCIO-PHILOSOPHICAL THOUGHT OF WESTERN EUROPE IN THE ERA OF RENAISSANCE //Scientific Bulletin of Namangan State University. – 2019. – Т. 1. – №. 5. – С. 168-173.
  4. Normatova D. E. The Social And Moral Views Of Michelle Eckem De Monten //Scientific Bulletin of Namangan State University. – 2019. – Т. 1. – №. 10. – С. 184-187.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Determining Factors for the Development of Critical Thinking in Higher Education

    Jaramillo Gómez, D. L., Álvarez Maestre, A. J., Parada Trujillo, A. E., Pérez Fuentes, C. A., Bedoya Ortiz, D. H., & Sanabria Alarcón, R. K. (2025) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence13060059 · Cited by 50

    “However, these initiatives require an institutional environment that values inquiry and debate, as well as teachers prepared to guide and provide feedback on complex reasoning processes (Kazemian et al. 2021; Koseni et al. 2025; Nuritdinov 2024; Tsopra et al. 2023).”

See all 2

Related

Metadata

Authors
Nuritdinov, N.
Affiliations
Ferghana State University (UZ)
Corresponding author
Nuritdinov, Navruz
Venue
Pubmedia Social Sciences and Humanities
Publisher
Indonesian Journal Publisher
Published
2024-11-14
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
9
ISSN
3025-2660 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.47134/pssh.v2i2.294
OpenAlex
W4404494053
Cited by
2
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 2
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
Pubmedia Social Sciences and Humanities (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal Education and Practice Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Law › Comparative and International Law Studies
Keywords
critical thinking, sociocultural factors, legal knowledge, legal education, law schools, course program, analytical thinking, problem solving, legal interpretation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review