The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
RETRACT THE ARTICLE. BAD PRACTICES,Home Advantage in Basketball: a Longitudinal Analysis of the NBA Playoffs (1946-2022)
Abstract
The aim of this study was to analyze the home advantage in the NBA playoffs from its first season, 1946/1947, to its most recent season, 2021/2022. All data was collected directly from the official NBA website. From each game we collected the season, name of the teams, final score, game location and playoff stage (first round, conference semi-finals, conference finals and finals). The home advantage was calculated as the number of home wins expressed as a percentage of all games played. We compare the HA between the seasons before and after 1965 using the Mann-Whitney test. The significance level was adopted at p<0.05. From the analysis of 4,259 matches, we confirmed the HA in NBA playoffs showing that approximately 65% of the games played at home correspond to victory. In 73 seasons (96%) the home teams had an advantage playing at home. Two seasons were exceptions, the 1965/66 and 2019/20, being the only ones in history in which the visiting teams had a great advantage during the playoffs. We found a decrease in HA after 1965 and a smaller variation among the seasons. Lastly, we found no difference among the playoff stages. These findings provide important information for coaches and managers regarding the different strategies when playing at home or away during the NBA playoffs. Key words: performance, competitiveness, match location, team sport, crowd effect
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Most of the studies in this review found that home teams have a higher winning percentage compared to away teams [26].”
From The Influence of Home-Court Advantage in Elite Basketball: A Systematic Review (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“Barreira and Morgado [26] analyzed 76 seasons of the NBA between 1946 and 2022 and noted that home advantage in the NBA remained consistent with a percentage of around 65%, but with a significant decrease since 1965 [26].”
From The Influence of Home-Court Advantage in Elite Basketball: A Systematic Review (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Influence of Home-Court Advantage in Elite Basketball: A Systematic Review
Mochales Cuesta, I., Jiménez-Sáiz, S. L., Kelly, A. L., & Bustamante-Sánchez, Á. (2024) · Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology · doi:10.3390/jfmk9040192 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Barreira, J., & Morgado, G.
- ORCID
- Barreira, Júlia
- Venue
- Retos
- Publisher
- JURUFRA SL
- Published
- 2023-01-02
- Volume
- 47
- Pages
- 691-694
- ISSN
- 1988-2041
- 1579-1726
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RETRACT THE ARTICLE. BAD PRACTICES,Home Advantage in Basketball: a Longitudinal Analysis of the NBA Playoffs (1946-2022). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.47197/retos.v47.95843
- The paper
- Barreira, J., & Morgado, G. (2023). RETRACT THE ARTICLE. BAD PRACTICES,Home Advantage in Basketball: a Longitudinal Analysis of the NBA Playoffs (1946-2022). Retos. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v47.95843
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
