Accountability in the twin peaks model of financial regulation in South Africa
Abstract
The Financial Sector Regulation (FSR) Act 9 of 2017 implemented the first stage of the Twin Peaks model of financial regulation in South Africa. The Act established the Prudential Authority and the Financial Sector Conduct Authority to make the financial sector safer by using a more robust prudential and market conduct framework. The South African Reserve Bank received an enhanced mandate to promote and maintain financial stability. Since accountability is a core goal in financial regulation, this paper analyses the notion of accountability and specifically the accountability of the regulators in a Twin Peaks model of financial regulation. The legislative framework put in place by the FSR Act goes a long way in adhering to principles of accountability. The financial sector regulators are obliged to consult with various stakeholders such as the Minister of Finance and financial institutions. The regulators are subject to control measures, and Parliament holds them accountable. Nevertheless, the authors suggest that one more step is necessary. There should be more debate and engagement by the regulators with the general public to increase public knowledge of financial sector regulation in South Africa.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The PA is responsible for regulating and supervising financial institutions and ensuring the system-wide safety and soundness of the South African financial sector.
“The PA is responsible for regulating and supervising financial institutions and ensuring the system-wide safety and soundness of the South African financial sector.42”
From An Overview Analysis of Financial Stability in the South African Banking Sector (2025) · cites this paper as [42]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An Overview Analysis of Financial Stability in the South African Banking Sector
Tsaura, O., Chitimira, H., & Torerai, E. (2025) · Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal · doi:10.17159/1727-3781/2025/v28i0a21374 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- van Niekerk, G., & ’Nyane, H.
- Venue
- South African Mercantile Law Journal
- Publisher
- Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd
- Published
- 2022
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 382-403
- ISSN
- 1015-0099 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4385391876
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- SA Mercantile Law Journal = SA Tydskrif vir Handelsreg (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Global Financial Regulation and Crises
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Regulation and Compliance Studies
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal Issues in South Africa
- Keywords
- Twin Peaks model, financial regulation, accountability, South African Reserve Bank, prudential regulation, market conduct, financial stability, stakeholder consultation, citizen participation, South Africa
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review