Accessible by design: Applying UDL principles in a first year undergraduate course
Open accessAbstract
This article presents a case study of a technology-enhanced face-to-face health sciences course in which the principles of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) were applied. Students were offered a variety of means of representation, engagement, and expression throughout the course, and were surveyed and interviewed at the end of the term to identify how the UDL-inspired course attributes influenced their perceptions of course accessibility. Students responded very positively to the course design, and felt that the weaving of UDL throughout the course resulted in increased flexibility, social presence, reduced stress, and enhanced success. Overall, students felt more in control of their own learning process and empowered to make personal choices to best support their own learning. This course design also led to increased satisfaction from the perspective of the instructor and reduced the need for intervention by the campus disability services department.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Westine, C. D., Oyarzun, B., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Casto, A., Okraski, C., Park, G., Person, J., & Steele, L. (2019) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.4258 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Singleton, K. J., Evmenova, A., Kinas Jerome, M., & Clark, K. (2019) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v23i1.1407 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Universal Design for Learning and Accessibility: A Practitioner Approach
O'Shaughnessy, T. J. (2021) · Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-7106-4.ch002 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Instructional Designers’ Perceptions of Accessible and Inclusive Online Course Design
Lomellini, A., Lowenthal, P. R., Trespalacios, J., & Snelson, C. (2024) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v28i4.3719 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Lowenthal, P. R., Lomellini, A., Smith, C., & Greear, K. (2021) · Quarterly Review of Distance Education · doi:10.1108/qrde-12-2021-0002
- Authors
- Kumar, K. L., & Wideman, M.
- Affiliations
- York University (CA)
- Ontario Tech University (CA)
- ORCID
- Kumar, Kari Lynne
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Higher Education
- Published
- 2014-04-30
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 125-147
- ISSN
- 0316-1218 (ISSN-L)
- 2293-6602
- OpenAlex
- W1889460518
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 12.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Higher Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Keywords
- Universal Design for Learning, course accessibility, health sciences education, technology-enhanced learning, student perceptions, student empowerment, social presence, student stress, disability services, inclusive course design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review