Cited by 189Disability Education and EmploymentOnline and Blended LearningDigital Accessibility for Disabilities

Accessible by design: Applying UDL principles in a first year undergraduate course

Open access
Kumar, Kari Lynne, Wideman, Maureen·2014·Canadian Journal of Higher Education

Abstract

This article presents a case study of a technology-enhanced face-to-face health sciences course in which the principles of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) were applied. Students were offered a variety of means of representation, engagement, and expression throughout the course, and were surveyed and interviewed at the end of the term to identify how the UDL-inspired course attributes influenced their perceptions of course accessibility. Students responded very positively to the course design, and felt that the weaving of UDL throughout the course resulted in increased flexibility, social presence, reduced stress, and enhanced success. Overall, students felt more in control of their own learning process and empowered to make personal choices to best support their own learning. This course design also led to increased satisfaction from the perspective of the instructor and reduced the need for intervention by the campus disability services department.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.47678/cjhe.v44i1.183704

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kumar, K. L., & Wideman, M.
Affiliations
  • York University (CA)
  • Ontario Tech University (CA)
Venue
Canadian Journal of Higher Education
Published
2014-04-30
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
125-147
ISSN
  • 0316-1218 (ISSN-L)
  • 2293-6602
OpenAlex
W1889460518
Cited by
189
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
12.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Higher Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
Keywords
Universal Design for Learning, course accessibility, health sciences education, technology-enhanced learning, student perceptions, student empowerment, social presence, student stress, disability services, inclusive course design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review