Cited by 2International Relations and Foreign PolicyGlobal Political and Economic RelationsEuropean Union Policy and Governance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The EU-ASEAN Ties: A Strategic Partnership? : Assessing the Development of Relations through the Lens of Political and Economic Cooperation

Open access
Páldi, Zoltán·2020·Foreign Policy Review

Abstract

The European Union and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations are both fundamental international organizations in their respective geographical regions, striving to become key players in shaping the global political landscape, reaching out far beyond their borders.In light of this, one might think it was already timely to raise the two blocs' partnership to the strategic level.Analysing official documents, and drawing upon previous researches in the field and a number of in-depth interviews with stakeholders from both sides of the EU-ASEAN ties, this article has given an outline on the development of relations between the two entities, with a particular focus on the political and economic domains.Highlighting the efforts made to pursue the elevation of ties to a Strategic Partnership, it concluded that ASEAN still primarily regards the EU as a trading partner with limited weight as a political and security actor.Protracted bilateral disputes between the EU and certain ASEAN member states also hindered the upgrade of relations for some time.The article argued that even though much has been done lately to approximate the two organisations' viewpoints, and the long-awaited official announcement of the EU-ASEAN Strategic Partnership that finally happened in December 2020 was beyond doubt an important milestone, there is still work to do to further streamline the ties.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.47706/kkifpr.2020.13.96-113

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Metadata

Authors
Páldi, Z.
Corresponding author
Páldi, Zoltán
Venue
Foreign Policy Review
Published
2020
Volume
13
Pages
96-113
ISSN
  • 1588-7855 (ISSN-L)
  • 2064-9428
OpenAlex
W3124049039
Cited by
2
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Foreign Policy Review (publishedVersion)
  • Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Political and Economic Relations
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European Union Policy and Governance
Keywords
EU-ASEAN relations, strategic partnership, political cooperation, economic cooperation, ASEAN, European Union, bilateral conflict, trade relations, security cooperation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review