Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 48E-Government and Public ServicesPublic Administration in Developing NationsSmart Cities and Technologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Systematic Literature Review of E-Government Implementation in Developing Countries: Examining Urban-Rural Disparities, Institutional Capacity, and Socio-Cultural Factors in the Context of Local Governance and Progress towards SDG 16.6

F. S., Omweri,·2024·International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science

Abstract

This systematic literature review examines the implementation of e-government initiatives in developing countries, focusing on their impact on public service delivery and progress towards Sustainable Development Goal 16.6. Through a comprehensive analysis of peer-reviewed articles, policy documents, and case studies, the research explores the interplay between institutional capacity, socio-cultural factors, and the digital divide in shaping e-government outcomes across urban and rural contexts in countries including Ghana, South Africa, Kenya, India, Nigeria, Brazil, and Indonesia. Following a rigorous search strategy and inclusion criteria, the review synthesizes findings from multiple sources, highlighting significant advancements in e-government adoption, particularly in urban areas, while identifying persistent challenges in rural regions due to inadequate infrastructure, limited digital literacy, and resource constraints. The systematic review of literature underscores the potential of e-government to enhance transparency, reduce corruption, and improve service delivery, as exemplified through successful initiatives in countries like Rwanda and Estonia. However, the synthesized evidence also reveals uneven progress, exacerbated through the urban-rural digital divide and varying institutional capacities. Systematically analyzing and integrating existing research, this review concludes with evidence-based recommendations for bridging these gaps, emphasizing the need for targeted infrastructure development, digital literacy programs, inclusive design approaches, and context-specific solutions to ensure equitable access to e-government services and accelerate progress towards effective, accountable, and transparent institutions at all levels.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.47772/ijriss.2024.808088

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
F. S., O.
Venue
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science
Published
2024
Volume
VIII
Issue
VIII
Pages
1173-1199
ISSN
2454-6186 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402087523
Cited by
48
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 1
FWCI
14.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration in Developing Nations
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Smart Cities and Technologies
Keywords
e-government, developing countries, rural-urban digital divide, institutional capacity, sociocultural factors, local governance, public service delivery, digital literacy, digital infrastructure, transparency and accountability, anti-corruption, inclusive design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review