The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Systematic Literature Review of E-Government Implementation in Developing Countries: Examining Urban-Rural Disparities, Institutional Capacity, and Socio-Cultural Factors in the Context of Local Governance and Progress towards SDG 16.6
Abstract
This systematic literature review examines the implementation of e-government initiatives in developing countries, focusing on their impact on public service delivery and progress towards Sustainable Development Goal 16.6. Through a comprehensive analysis of peer-reviewed articles, policy documents, and case studies, the research explores the interplay between institutional capacity, socio-cultural factors, and the digital divide in shaping e-government outcomes across urban and rural contexts in countries including Ghana, South Africa, Kenya, India, Nigeria, Brazil, and Indonesia. Following a rigorous search strategy and inclusion criteria, the review synthesizes findings from multiple sources, highlighting significant advancements in e-government adoption, particularly in urban areas, while identifying persistent challenges in rural regions due to inadequate infrastructure, limited digital literacy, and resource constraints. The systematic review of literature underscores the potential of e-government to enhance transparency, reduce corruption, and improve service delivery, as exemplified through successful initiatives in countries like Rwanda and Estonia. However, the synthesized evidence also reveals uneven progress, exacerbated through the urban-rural digital divide and varying institutional capacities. Systematically analyzing and integrating existing research, this review concludes with evidence-based recommendations for bridging these gaps, emphasizing the need for targeted infrastructure development, digital literacy programs, inclusive design approaches, and context-specific solutions to ensure equitable access to e-government services and accelerate progress towards effective, accountable, and transparent institutions at all levels.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Conversely, in several African LIS contexts, researchers have documented that cultural adaptation alone proves insufficient due to resource constraints, infrastructure gaps, and weak institutional support for sustained engagement (Omweri, 2024), aligning closely with the Malaysian finding that cultural adaptation requires reinforcement through participatory and”
From Fostering community empowerment through library social responsibility: A social capital approach in Malaysian academic libraries (2026) · cites this paper as Omweri, 2024
Citations
Cited by
Abdul Latif, N., Samsuddin, S. F., & Kaur, K. (2026) · Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science · doi:10.22452/mjlis.vol31no1.5
“…adaptation alone proves insufficient due to resource constraints, infrastructure gaps, and weak institutional support for sustained engagement (Omweri, 2024), aligning closely with the Malaysian finding that cultural adaptation requires reinforcement through participatory and trust-building…”
Metadata
- Authors
- F. S., O.
- Venue
- International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science
- Publisher
- RSIS International
- Published
- 2024
- Volume
- VIII
- Issue
- VIII
- Pages
- 1173-1199
- ISSN
- 2454-6186 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4402087523
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 14.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration in Developing Nations
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Smart Cities and Technologies
- Keywords
- e-government, developing countries, rural-urban digital divide, institutional capacity, sociocultural factors, local governance, public service delivery, digital literacy, digital infrastructure, transparency and accountability, anti-corruption, inclusive design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review