Cited by 7Music and Audio ProcessingAnimal Vocal Communication and BehaviorWildlife Ecology and Conservation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bridging AI and Ecology: CILNN and XAI for Acoustic Based Prediction of Dangerous Wild Animals

Open access
Govindaprabhu GB, Sumathi M, Neyvasagam, Sharan, Kumar J, Naveen Ananda·2025·International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Scope

Abstract

In habitats that are encroaching on humans, human-wildlife conflict is an increasing global challenge. There is a significant risk of human injury and retaliatory action being taken if humans encounter dangerous animals. This work presents a novel approach to automated detection and classification of dangerous animals using audio signals, with a focus on model interpretability. This work introduces the Convolutional Interconnected Layer Neural Network (CILNN), a deep learning architecture designed to effectively process and classify animal vocalizations. Our method leverages a comprehensive set of audio features, including Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs) and spectral characteristics, optimized through SHAP-based feature selection. The CILNN incorporates interconnected layers and attention mechanisms to enhance feature extraction and model performance. It evaluates proposed approach on a diverse dataset of vocalizations from five dangerous animal species: bears, bison, cheetahs, elephants, and wild boars. Experimental results demonstrate that the CILNN outperforms traditional machine learning models such as Random Forests and Decision Trees in classification accuracy and robustness. Crucially, it employs Explainable AI (XAI) techniques, including SHAP values and decision tree visualizations, to interpret the decision-making processes of both our CILNN (90.6% accuracy) and other models. This interpretability analysis provides insights into feature importance and model behavior, enhancing trust and understanding in the classification process. Our work contributes to wildlife monitoring and human-wildlife conflict mitigation by offering an efficient, accurate, and interpretable method for acoustic-based animal detection

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.47857/irjms.2025.v06i01.01882

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Schön PC, Puppe B, Manteuffel G. Automated Recording of Stress Vocalizations as A Tool to Document Impaired Welfare in Pigs. Animal Welfare. 2004; 131(2):105-110.
  2. Soltis J, Blowers TE, Savage A. Measuring positive and negative affect in the voiced sounds of African elephants Loxodonta Africana. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011; 129(2):1059-1066.
  3. Govindaprabhu GB, Sumathi M. Ethno medicine of Indigenous Communities: Tamil Traditional Medicinal Plants Leaf detection using Deep Learning Models. Procedia Comp Sci. 2024; 235(1):1135-1144.
  4. Govindaprabhu GB, Sumathi M. Safeguarding Humans from Attacks Using AI-Enabled (DQN)Wild Animal Identification System. Int Res J Multi-discip Scope (IRJMS), 2024; 5(3): 285-302.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Govindaprabhu, G. B., Sumathi, M., Neyvasagam, S., & Kumar J, N. A.
Affiliations
Madurai Kamaraj University (IN)
Venue
International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Scope
Published
2025
Volume
06
Issue
01
Pages
1280-1298
ISSN
2582-631X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407421095
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2
FWCI
2.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Scope (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
human-wildlife conflict, explainable AI, SHAP feature selection, Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients, attention mechanism, wildlife monitoring, bison, cheetah, elephants, wild boar

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review